Civilization IV Wins Readers Choice Awards at Wargamer.com!

[Jvstin]

Haven't seen this posted anywhere on this site yet...

Civilization IV has won two Readers Choice awards at Wargamer.com, a longtime website devoted to Wargames.

Civilization IV won for best strategy game
http://www.wargamer.com/articles/rea...2005/page4.asp
and for Game of the Year.
http://www.wargamer.com/articles/rea...005/page10.asp

[Nacht]

Awards

[Urban Ranger]

A Settler from 2001? Wow.

[LordShiva]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
A Settler from 2001? Wow.

[Son of David]

Civ4 deserves these awards and then some.

I think the number of hours I've spent playing it is now well into the hundreds. And I've only just started getting used to it ....

[Jvstin]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
A Settler from 2001? Wow.

I've been reading Apolyton for years, but generally don't post

[Zoid]

Keep this pace up and you´ll be Chieftain when the release Civ 5

[Crossfire]

Nah, it will take him till Civ7 to reach Chieftain.

[Jvstin]

Of course, if I incessantly reply in this thread, it could come sooner.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Go for it, dude!

[Urban Ranger]

That's right, let Imran be your guide

[Zoid]

Feel the power of the dark side!

[Nikolai]

It's never too late, I think I used the same time to become King as I used becoming where I am now; halfway to deity.

[Jvstin]

If I had posted all of the gripes I had with Civilization III, I'd be halfway to King, if not Emperor, by now. But I grumbled in silence and just nodded thoughfully without reply.

Civ IV really does live up to the promise of a sequel to Civ II. Civ III isn't as bad as, say, MOO III (shudder), but it was a letdown.

[Nikolai]

Indeed did it lack the little extra that made Civ1/2, and now 4, great. It was a letdown in that respect. But still it was an okay game, and many civvers got to know Civ as a great franchise through Civ3.