I've started my first marathon game and believe t's far easier than normal or epic.
This may be due to the settings I used (a small, a bit crowded map), but I do not think so:
Why would Marathon be easier than normal?
I was able to take out an enemy capital before they could build effective defenders, because it took them more time to find the needed techs than it would have on normal or even epic. Thus an early war looks easier to me on Marathon.
I tend to think epic is already easier and more interesting than normal because you can march an army and wage war before the army has become obsolete.
Furthermore, the ai gets free units (I'm playing at monarch), but these archers won't make such a difference because you have more time to build units, so it's easier to offset the small advantage given the ai in the early game.
Did I just make a good start or has someone else noticed that it's easier to win on Marathon than on normal?
This may be due to the settings I used (a small, a bit crowded map), but I do not think so:
Why would Marathon be easier than normal?
I was able to take out an enemy capital before they could build effective defenders, because it took them more time to find the needed techs than it would have on normal or even epic. Thus an early war looks easier to me on Marathon.
I tend to think epic is already easier and more interesting than normal because you can march an army and wage war before the army has become obsolete.
Furthermore, the ai gets free units (I'm playing at monarch), but these archers won't make such a difference because you have more time to build units, so it's easier to offset the small advantage given the ai in the early game.
Did I just make a good start or has someone else noticed that it's easier to win on Marathon than on normal?
Comment