Working with Tokugawa on Noble for my first domination game. Huge map, continents, so there are eight other people I'm up against. I'm up 750 points on the closest competitor and am now cranking out modern armor, but only 2-3 of them are viable competitors.
I've got a lot of land to cover, and I'm just crossing into late 1800s.
My strategy was to knock everyone down a few pegs before I start worrying about trying to take over territory to avoid seeing someone complete the Apollo project on me. So I would land a craft, take a coastal town (hopefully a captial), hold it as a base of operations on that continent/upgrade center and rape/pillage from there.
The issue was that any town after that initial would be destroyed under the assumption that the enemy would eventually overtake it either culturally or militarily. So better to leave nothing than give them an opportunity to take it back.l
My issue is after taking out a town or two, my assault would lose steam, my units would be badly damaged. I have one town on the continent fortified for the next assault into enemy turf.
Is it better in these situations to destroy the cities, or attempt to keep towns that are close together in an attempt to make an actual push toward holding 60% of the planet?
I've got a lot of land to cover, and I'm just crossing into late 1800s.
My strategy was to knock everyone down a few pegs before I start worrying about trying to take over territory to avoid seeing someone complete the Apollo project on me. So I would land a craft, take a coastal town (hopefully a captial), hold it as a base of operations on that continent/upgrade center and rape/pillage from there.
The issue was that any town after that initial would be destroyed under the assumption that the enemy would eventually overtake it either culturally or militarily. So better to leave nothing than give them an opportunity to take it back.l
My issue is after taking out a town or two, my assault would lose steam, my units would be badly damaged. I have one town on the continent fortified for the next assault into enemy turf.
Is it better in these situations to destroy the cities, or attempt to keep towns that are close together in an attempt to make an actual push toward holding 60% of the planet?
Comment