Question about win % in 1.52

[DeepO]

It would have been easy to cap the results to 99.9 and 0.1%, but no better test than to see if you ever go over 100%
It is correct, though. It shows 100.0%, which is to the best of my knowledge the scientific way of saying that the result has been rounded to 1 decimal.

DeepO

[Shaka II]

Originally posted by Jonny
So that explains why I saw a 128.8% yesterday. Forgot to grab a screenie though. (But at least I won the battle; I would have been thoroughly annoyed if I hadn't.)

Gotcha beat, I had 152% in one match up. It's the only instance so far that I've seen this effect, but it was clear that the odds would have been close to 100% anyway.

[Mujadaddy]

what were these >100% matchups? Tank vs. Spear?

[Addled Platypus]

I have noticed in stack attacks

the best odds might be with one type of unit, not stacked(swordsman,axeman..etc)

In a stack attacking a city, I had 2 sword/2 axe/2 horse

defending was 1 chariot/2 arch

I chose the axemen first, which gave me better odds then the whole stack (they took out the chariot)
then I chose the swordsmen to follow up agaisnt the archers

it seemed that I took the city faster than before

I will have to do a bunch of screenies on next attack to better show this

[Kilson]

Yesterday, when attacking, my Cho-ko-nu had 101.7% chance against a defending Skirmisher. The skirmisher was fortified in a city, and had various defensive bonuses, and an upgrade or two. My unit also had some upgrades. Both units were damaged, though the Skirmisher was more so.

Needless to say, I lost the combat and was very unhappy.

[Yosho]

Originally posted by DeepO
It would have been easy to cap the results to 99.9 and 0.1%, but no better test than to see if you ever go over 100%
It is correct, though. It shows 100.0%, which is to the best of my knowledge the scientific way of saying that the result has been rounded to 1 decimal.

DeepO

I saw a 100.1% chance of a win before.