The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
All the current animals are pretty much the same anyway. A little difference in strength and they look different of course. But in effect they are just units to add some other considerations to the early game. Having different animals would just be having the same animals with different pictures.
Yeah, before say the 17th century, there should giant octopusses and such devouring ships!!
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Originally posted by teutonic_knight
I would like to see other animals as well. Maybe have panthers(jungle), jaguars, alligators, etc.
Panthers are already in.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
If you play the Japanese, you have to fight off godzilla barb units and all the assorted monsters fought over the years. These barb attacks only happen in the modern era.
Originally posted by Shogun Gunner
If you play the Japanese, you have to fight off godzilla barb units and all the assorted monsters fought over the years. These barb attacks only happen in the modern era.
Is there going to be a King Kong unit for the Americans then?
If so then it should belong to a different group than Godzilla. The tricky thing would be programming the game so that if the Japanese player could see the Godzilla vs. King Kong fight then Godzilla wins, but King Kong automatically wins if the American player can see the fight. Trickier still would be the case where both see them fight. You'd have to have Godzilla appear to win for the Japanese and King Kong appear to win for the Americans, and this would involve some clever coding and modified "stealth" abilities.
-Drachasor
"If there's a child on the south side of Chicago who can't read, that matters to me, even if it's not my child. If there's a senior citizen somewhere who can't pay for her prescription and has to choose between medicine and the rent, that makes my life poorer, even if it's not my grandmother. If there's an Arab American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney or due process, that threatens my civil liberties. It's that fundamental belief -- I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper -- that makes this country work." - Barack Obama
I think it's a stretch that animal units are running around -with flags! I'm actually okay with it as it makes for some interesting choices in the opening stages of the game. I do think the civ3 method of barbs all the time is probably more realistic. Like I said, I can live with cIV's approach.
Originally posted by Shogun Gunner
ummm.....I'm not serious.
I think it's a stretch that animal units are running around -with flags! I'm actually okay with it as it makes for some interesting choices in the opening stages of the game. I do think the civ3 method of barbs all the time is probably more realistic. Like I said, I can live with cIV's approach.
Are you not familiar with the King Kong vs. Godzilla movie?
-Drachasor
"If there's a child on the south side of Chicago who can't read, that matters to me, even if it's not my child. If there's a senior citizen somewhere who can't pay for her prescription and has to choose between medicine and the rent, that makes my life poorer, even if it's not my grandmother. If there's an Arab American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney or due process, that threatens my civil liberties. It's that fundamental belief -- I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper -- that makes this country work." - Barack Obama
Originally posted by Impaler[WrG]
Well I think we need a new flag for animals, seperate from the Barbarian Flag
I don't think we need a new flag for animals; animals shouldn't have flags at all.
But I wonder, suppose you leave animals on the map, and kill off all the barbarian "human" units you can find, will barbs end up defending their cities with wolves?
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Originally posted by Shogun Gunner
I am familiar with many of these movies only through Mystery Science Theatre 3000
Godzilla Vs. Megalon
Godzilla vs The Sea Monster
Gamera vs Barugon
Gamera vs Guiron
are some that come to mind. In Civ? No...
Godzilla vs. King Kong had two endings. In Japan Godzilla won at the end, but in America King Kong won at the end.
-Drachasor
PS. Hence the basis for my joke.
"If there's a child on the south side of Chicago who can't read, that matters to me, even if it's not my child. If there's a senior citizen somewhere who can't pay for her prescription and has to choose between medicine and the rent, that makes my life poorer, even if it's not my grandmother. If there's an Arab American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney or due process, that threatens my civil liberties. It's that fundamental belief -- I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper -- that makes this country work." - Barack Obama
I don't think we need a new flag for animals; animals shouldn't have flags at all.
But I wonder, suppose you leave animals on the map, and kill off all the barbarian "human" units you can find, will barbs end up defending their cities with wolves?
You know and realise it's not real animals, right?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment