As someone who actually LIKED Civ3 and played the heck of it for years (including beta testing for C3C), I still say Civ4 is better. The *game* is just so much more strategically interesting and fun.
That said, Civ3 had a better UI, graphics that could actually run on most systems, etc. Civ4 seems to have some pretty sloppy production when it comes to interfacing with a lot of graphics cards or using system resources. Hopefully, that's all patchable.
That said, Civ3 had a better UI, graphics that could actually run on most systems, etc. Civ4 seems to have some pretty sloppy production when it comes to interfacing with a lot of graphics cards or using system resources. Hopefully, that's all patchable.
Comment