Originally posted by Comte
You are right, I have no doubt they tried it. I do seriously suspect, however, that no more than a few of the QA machines were ATI, and that the QA wasn't very good in the first place. I found a progression break in the tutorial of all places.
And beyond that, we're arguing about this on a site with pop-ups. Pop ups. The lack of a forum is just boggling to me. This place is 4 clicks deep from the main Civ4 site and after the second click it's poorly organized, confusing, and located on a third party site with pop up windows. Seriously. You call that support?
You are right, I have no doubt they tried it. I do seriously suspect, however, that no more than a few of the QA machines were ATI, and that the QA wasn't very good in the first place. I found a progression break in the tutorial of all places.
And beyond that, we're arguing about this on a site with pop-ups. Pop ups. The lack of a forum is just boggling to me. This place is 4 clicks deep from the main Civ4 site and after the second click it's poorly organized, confusing, and located on a third party site with pop up windows. Seriously. You call that support?
That aside, I agree that the publisher (Take2) is doing a cruddy job on the PR side if Firaxis has to do this all via a 3rd party site. That being said, I'm certainly glad that Apolyton is gracious enough to pay it's own coin to keep this forum and hosting the fix files.
Comment