Why I have a low opnion of Civ III? Remeber that Civ II was the best game ever. Well at that time for most people it was. Civ III was way over hyped saying it would be better than Civ II and clearly it wasn't. With Civ II I spent many sleepless nights playing the game with only 2 hour or less sleep.
Also I bought the collerctors tin edtion wich was a complete bust. Didn't get the multiplayer that was suppose to be included, had to buy it in an ex pac.
They promised things wich were not included in the Civ III and over hyped the Collectors Tin edtion, that is why I have a low opnion of Civ III out of the box.
Civ IV does look promising and I don't see any real promises being made this time like for Civ III so that is good. I am glad the graphics aren't awsome(I know I complained about it at first then got thinking, I don't want awsome graphics, just good game play.) and hopefully all the game play will keep me up playing, having that ONE MORE TURN FEELING again wich I lost in Civ III.
Also I bought the collerctors tin edtion wich was a complete bust. Didn't get the multiplayer that was suppose to be included, had to buy it in an ex pac.
They promised things wich were not included in the Civ III and over hyped the Collectors Tin edtion, that is why I have a low opnion of Civ III out of the box.
Civ IV does look promising and I don't see any real promises being made this time like for Civ III so that is good. I am glad the graphics aren't awsome(I know I complained about it at first then got thinking, I don't want awsome graphics, just good game play.) and hopefully all the game play will keep me up playing, having that ONE MORE TURN FEELING again wich I lost in Civ III.

Comment