Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you think you'll win your first game?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I'll probably make really daft mistakes* and start over.

    * In one of my first CivIII games, I built the FP in my capital.
    Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

    It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
    The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Last Conformist
      I'll probably make really daft mistakes* and start over.

      * In one of my first CivIII games, I built the FP in my capital.
      I love being beaten by women - Lorizael

      Comment


      • #33
        I did the "palace jump" three times (without any notice - In my judgement,I was just bulding another improvement), before figure out what was happening.

        As people say, "RTFMS".
        In my defense, all I can say is : was my first game (I was playng America, and the Iroqs were annoying!!)
        RIAA sucks
        The Optimistas
        I'm a political cartoonist

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Dis
          I've always heard advice that it's best to start on diety level and learn from your mistakes, and not get into bad playing styles that you would have on chieftan level. Because I sometimes do develop bad playing styles.
          AFAIK, if you play on high level you are counteract to AI game (well, Soren programming skill, to be fair) *cheating*.

          So, we are not really learn to play a better game, but how to avoid the disadvantage;
          i.e. if the AI manage to build quickly (shield/hammer bonus) than me, I can:
          - learn to fine tune my production, to max squeeze my city production (good);
          - learn to produce on more optimized sequence/tech path combo (good);
          - discover that I can throw away the dirty water AND the child, let alone the building and learn to rush and kill other nation very early in the game (easy win, boring repeating game in the long run).

          If we are forced to learn and adopt the only safe path to victory we lose. If Soren cut any game alternate route like in Civ 3 (as raising cost of Palace building so much to prevent the strategic use of it, or support ICS by easy access back to randomly disappeared resources, etc) we are not learning how to improve our skill, IMHO.

          I'll play at more balanced level (regent), more to learn rules and game news by practice on the field (DoItYourself tutorial) than to win. Then I'll play some games at that level. Sometime I'll lose, mostly I'll win, then I'll move on higher level and quickly give up for excessive lenght of turns, too few spare time and (to be fair with the civ master) a real lack of proper deep strategical skill
          "We are reducing all the complexity of billions of people over 6000 years into a Civ box. Let me say: That's not only a PkZip effort....it's a real 'picture to Jpeg heavy loss in translation' kind of thing."
          - Admiral Naismith

          Comment


          • #35
            I always start on the ,lowest setting and goes up from there as soon as I think I am ready for a new challenge. I am pretty mediocre as a player though, so I usually don´t go above Prince(or whatever it is called now, stupid renaming...) at most... I am pretty sure I will win my first game, but not in a
            Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
            I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
            Also active on WePlayCiv.

            Comment


            • #36
              I'm definitely among those who starts off on Chieftain just to get the lay of the land -- and to try reckless ideas. For example, winning the "Age of Discovery" scenario as the Aztecs. I have already chosen my project for Civ4: Operation Rabbi. In other words, see if this new religion thing will allow you to conquer the world more through faith than through warfare.
              Esquire

              Comment


              • #37
                I suppose I'll start at the "fair" level.

                I've actually never played a game on Chieftain in CivIII.
                Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                Comment


                • #38
                  First game will be Monarch and I give it a 50/50 chance to win. Will be testing some around, not playing to much aimed at a win. Probably will abort the game and start new (bzw. I always abort my games as soon as my estimated chance to win is >90% or falls below 5%)
                  If its no fun why do it? Dance like noone is watching...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I just hope that my first game doesn't crash, I'll worry about actually winning later.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I will be begin on online ladder civ4 or king sp. i hope its not too easy.
                      I win i know it online or offline. Its only skill and ress what makes all

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I'll start my 1st game on Sid level and go for a 1CC game.

                        I'll win, of course...

                        Thing is, I'll forget to report it
                        The Mountain Sage of the Swiss Alps

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          This time they should write down in the manual something about difficulty setting, sth like: "It's not like in SMAC. Hard really means hard"
                          I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

                          Asher on molly bloom

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I'll start on a lower level, to learn a bit of the basics under the new framework. I expect I'll win with little difficulty under those circumstances.

                            Of course, I may be in for a surprise. Stranger things have happened.
                            -Darkstar
                            (Knight Errant Of Spam)

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I plan on playing on cheiftain the first time.then move up to regent after i've experienced the new features. After two or three games i'll probably move up to diety and try my luck.
                              Soren, we need our daily dose of new cIV news otherwise we might not live to buy the game.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Probably will win first game only because I won't probably start at a real hard level. Want to learn the game at an easy pace.

                                Besides, I've never considered the AI a valid opponent anyway. PvP is the real way to play!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X