Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Great citizens instead of great leaders

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Great citizens instead of great leaders

    History has been to a large extent affected by the prowess of great citizens. Some of them scientists, philosophers, religious leaders, politicians (not many of those) artists etc. One or two have been represented by Wonders (e.g. Michalangelos Chapel) and the Great Leader concept for victorious armies.

    I think it would be interesting if there were a small number of great citizens, say 2 or 3 per era, who could be born randomly or pseudo-randomly into a city in any particular civ.

    Their presence in the city/civ would gain appropriate bonuses e.g 50% extra science, for a period (lifetime, century after death, until end of era) perhaps enhanced or dependent on the presence of city improvements.

    It may be that their birth city should be pseudo-random - the larger the city/civ, the more chance of producing a great citizen. Also, maybe the presence of improvements or other preconditions should be necessary e.g. democracy govt required for Winston Churchill who increases defensive power of units by 25% while alive.

    The key thing obviously is that the great citizens would NOT be forcibly linked to their real-life civ - Churchill could be a Zulu, Neil Armstrong a Korean.

    edit typo
    Last edited by Laertes; July 7, 2004, 04:19.

  • #2
    It is a nice idea overall- I would tweek it in a few ways.

    One, larger civs should NOT be more likely to get these- the possiblities should also not be tied to any improvements either. If the idea of civ traits is kept, that should be a factor in terms of what kind of citizen appeared. Tech level should play a factor as well.


    But I think it is a nice modable idea.
    If you don't like reality, change it! me
    "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
    "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
    "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

    Comment


    • #3
      I think you are probably right about larger civs and improvements as it would probably accelerate the lead of the top civ

      Comment


      • #4
        goes along with some of the things I want...

        Comment


        • #5
          I think that each civ should have a pool of great citizen names (or perhaps have them generated by a pseudo-random name constructor), and when a great guy is called for, have it be chosen from that civ's name file.

          So the system calls for a great scientist citizen, and England is chosen. It could be Newton or Dawkins, but it won't ever be Einstein.
          The sons of the prophet were valiant and bold,
          And quite unaccustomed to fear,
          But the bravest of all is the one that I'm told,
          Is named Abdul Abulbul Amir

          Comment


          • #6
            Some should be prenamed, some should be random.

            Comment


            • #7
              How about a Great Worker who completes tasks faster? A Great Settler who plops down a pop 3 city? A Great Explorer? This is an idea that has possibilities.
              "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
              "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
              2004 Presidential Candidate
              2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

              Comment

              Working...
              X