Tweet
What do the rest of you think about being able to go against the UN (for certin civics) but that being a relationship cost to all civilizations who are following the UN elections.
-
-
Good, idea. I hate not being to build nukes and stuff, so I rather get rid of the UN of to ignore their decisions.Greetz, Ramses -
It should be possible to go against what was decided, at a cost (diplomatic hit with all civs? Making it impossible to sign defensive pacts with civs who followed the UN elections?)
Ramsses >> If this was Civ 1+2 I would agree with you, but this time I'm just confused. Why would anyone want to build nukes? Their chance of failure are very high and their damage done is very low... and worst of all: The AI doesn't build nukes
This space is empty... or is it?Comment
Comment