Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this game for Col what Civ3 was for civ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Boracks
    I agree the game is more playable than MOO3 (most games are...) but the issue with this game is versatility - there ain't none. It's like one of those puzzles where you draw a line through a maze. Once you know the route, why bother playing it?
    QFT.
    "BANANA POWAAAAH!!! (exclamation Zopperoni style)" - Mercator, in the OT 'What fruit are you?' thread
    Join the Civ2 Democratic Game! We have a banana option in every poll just for you to vote for!
    Many thanks to Zealot for wasting his time on the jobs section at Gamasutra - MarkG in the article SMAC2 IN FULL 3D? http://apolyton.net/misc/
    Always thought settlers looked like Viking helmets. Took me a while to spot they were supposed to be wagons. - The pirate about Settlers in Civ 1

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Boracks


      I agree the game is more playable than MOO3 (most games are...) but the issue with this game is versatility - there ain't none. It's like one of those puzzles where you draw a line through a maze. Once you know the route, why bother playing it?
      Because someone has got to do it. (H. Simpson)

      Comment

      Working...
      X