Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Calakmul: Keep or Raze?

  1. #1
    Swiss Pauli
    Reigning Tri-League Champion
    Join Date
    29 Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,612
    Country
    This is Swiss Pauli's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26

    Calakmul: Keep or Raze?

    We need to decide this within the next 48 hours or so, so I decided to put this in a thread to foucs the discussion.

    According to his post in the turnplayer thread, Sullla is cooking up a plan to use Calakmul as a naval base. This is fine so long as PAL don't resettle The Warning (maybe they should call it The Humbling if they do).

    If PAL does resettle then they will own the Fish because of the culture they've put into these tiles over the millennia. I think they'll also be able to claim the 3rd ring (i.e. right up to Calakmul itself) fairly easily as well.

    If we raze Calakmul, then we can settle inland (Corn and hills) which I think would make a handy unit pump on our eastern flank.

  2. #2
    Zeviz
    King
    Join Date
    05 Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,058
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    03:26
    I'd rather keep the city, because even if PAL gets back their cultural control, it's good to have an extra naval base in the channel. We have plenty of inland cities, but few high production coastal cities.

  3. #3
    mostly-harmless
    King mostly-harmless's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,097
    Country
    This is mostly-harmless's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26
    Are you sure the re-settled city gets the benefit from the old culture?

    I am in favour of keeping Calakmul.

    mh

  4. #4
    Sullla
    King
    Join Date
    03 Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,352
    Country
    This is Sullla's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    06:26
    This is a joke, right? Calakmul will come at size 10+, very likely with some infrastructure intact, in a highly strategic location on the Channel.

    Yes, we do want to keep the city. (We want to keep all of the remaining Imperio cities, actually.)

  5. #5
    Swiss Pauli
    Reigning Tri-League Champion
    Join Date
    29 Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,612
    Country
    This is Swiss Pauli's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26
    No I'm quite serious: it will be strangled by PAL's culture, so we risk not being able to move any ships in and out of there because of closed borders, and PAL will be able to see right into the city as well. If you're fine with that then we can keep it, but I'm not sure of the strategic advantage of doing so.

  6. #6
    mostly-harmless
    King mostly-harmless's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,097
    Country
    This is mostly-harmless's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26
    I will ask again:
    Surely a new founded city will not get instant border pops just because there is old culture in that area???

    mh

  7. #7
    Swiss Pauli
    Reigning Tri-League Champion
    Join Date
    29 Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,612
    Country
    This is Swiss Pauli's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26
    It won't get instant border pops, but when it does pop borders it will claim the tiles from us because of the culture The Warning exerted on those tiles.

  8. #8
    timmy827
    Chieftain
    Join Date
    20 Feb 2009
    Posts
    67
    Country
    This is timmy827's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    04:26
    Definitely keep. Ships can't be landlocked there, the tile 1SE cannot ever have any PAL culture because it's 2SW of the nearest land point on the other continent. Just logged in and confirmed that it has no Egyptian culture despite being 3rd ring for (the remains of) The Warning. Agree with Sullla on his points too.

  9. #9
    Sullla
    King
    Join Date
    03 Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,352
    Country
    This is Sullla's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    06:26
    Even if we never get control of a single water tile - and I think we will, PAL re-settling The Warning not withstanding - Calakmul comes with an irrigated corn tile (6 food!) and a ton of river grassland tiles. Keeper all the way.

  10. #10
    sooooo
    King
    Join Date
    05 Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,882
    Country
    This is sooooo's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    June 20, 2013
    Local Time
    11:26
    Keep, the inland tiles are fine to work.

Similar Threads

  1. Should I keep or should I raze?
    By LeonDeV in forum Civilization IV General
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: June 11, 2009, 17:51
  2. To Raze or not to Raze...
    By cybrgamr in forum Civilization IV General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 22, 2007, 15:29
  3. ack, to raze or not to raze...
    By Kuciwalker in forum Civilization IV General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: August 19, 2006, 14:54
  4. To Raze or not to Raze, That is the question..
    By Artifex in forum Civ3-Strategy-Archive
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: July 15, 2002, 02:48
  5. When to RAZE and when to KEEP?
    By Genghis John in forum Civ3-Strategy-Archive
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: November 26, 2001, 15:58

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions