No
When you set the opposing civ selectors to random instead of a specific civ...
Is "NONE" counted as a possible random result?
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work...After eight years of this Administration, we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!" — Henry Morgenthau, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Treasury secretary, 1941.
No
Consul of Apolyton (retired) of the Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
President (retired) of the Civ3 Democracy Game
Reminds me; why isn't there a way to randomize the number of opponents? That's just about the only aspect of world-creation you can't randomize.
Last edited by Last Conformist; May 14, 2004 at 14:38.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
good point , perhaps an addition for civ4 is to have a max min random enemy civs ...
Thanks, I always avoided random because I thought it might, and I like playing maximum civs.
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work...After eight years of this Administration, we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!" — Henry Morgenthau, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Treasury secretary, 1941.
max civs is fun . . . max civs on large archipelagos, large world. plenty of space for everyone, but makes domination fun.
Well, that would have to do with world size, then...Originally posted by Last Conformist
Reminds me; why isn't there a way to randomize the number of opponents? That's just about the only aspect of world-creation you can't randomize.
What you could do, if you have any programming skills or know someone who does, is make a dual-system random number generator. First it will randomly select a map size (which you also can't currently do), and then based on the map size it picks a random number of opponents...THis would somewhat lessen the fun of randomness by knowing how random some things are, and would require a lot more work then a 'random' button would allow...
I AM.CHRISTIAN
Yes, random world sizes should also be added for CivIV.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
Small world with 32 civs would be fun, although somewhat ridiculous.
I've done this several times. It's SO MUCH FUN.Originally posted by pedrojedi
Small world with 32 civs would be fun, although somewhat ridiculous.
Consul of Apolyton (retired) of the Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
President (retired) of the Civ3 Democracy Game
Try out my Hexette map - five civs on 16X16!
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks