Most of the weapons you cited are high end weapons there is some debate as to whether or not we need more low end capability.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kerry’s hypocrisy
Collapse
X
-
What can make a nigga wanna fight a whole night club/Figure that he ought to maybe be a pimp simply 'cause he don't like love/What can make a nigga wanna achy, break all rules/In a book when it took a lot to get you hooked up to this volume/
What can make a nigga wanna loose all faith in/Anything that he can't feel through his chest wit sensation
-
Re: Kerry’s hypocrisy
Originally posted by jimmytrick
Kerry’s hypocrisy
WASHINGTON (AP) - John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee-in-waiting, challenged the Bush administration Saturday to reimburse the families of U.S. troops "who had to buy the body armor" needed for protection in Iraq.
"If I am president, I will be prepared to use military force to protect our security, our people and our vital interests," the Massachusetts senator said in the Democrats' weekly radio address.
"But I will never send our troops into harm's way without enough firepower and support."
This is the same man who voted against almost every significant weapons system proposed over the last thirty years.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Many of the weapons systems that Kerry voted against are cash cows whose existence would not positively effect the US's ability to conduct the type of combat operation currently being undertaken."Remember, there's good stuff in American culture, too. It's just that by "good stuff" we mean "attacking the French," and Germany's been doing that for ages now, so, well, where does that leave us?" - Elok
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: Kerry’s hypocrisy
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Did it? If that is, he's truly dumb.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: Re: Kerry’s hypocrisy
Originally posted by DinoDoc
Kerry likes having it both ways on any issue.
However, it still may be true that he would refund the families with a separate program.In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Stealth aircraft is militarily insignificant. Do they really need them to drop their fragmentation bombs?
Comment
-
Kerry's a worldview on America is that America is the problem not the solution. He consistently takes the side of Communist régimes and opposes all forms of resistance to communism. He was (and still is) an advocate of the North Vietnamese and the Sandinistas. During the Cold War he opposed every weapon system that would give American the advantage over our Communist opponent.
When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Kerry was against removing him. Kerry was opposed to even protecting Saudi Arabia. Kerry saw no American interests in keeping the world's oil supply out the hands of a fascist madman.
When Kerry's campaign was in dire straits just prior to the Iowa caucuses, Kerry called in a number of liberal media folks and explained to them that had he been president we would have never gone to war against Saddam Hussein. Let us repeat that. He said, "Never." He did not say that he would've gone with French support.
Kerry has been among Israel's harshest critics to audiences other then Jews to whom he denies ever having criticized Israel.
If you like a pro Communist, anti-American anti-Israeli president, and Kerry is your man.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Kerry’s hypocrisy
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Well, if these funds were really meant to 'refund body armours', then it was a silly move from him.
However, it still may be true that he would refund the families with a separate program.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ned
Kerry's a worldview on America is that America is the problem not the solution. He consistently takes the side of Communist régimes and opposes all forms of resistance to communism. He was (and still is) an advocate of the North Vietnamese and the Sandinistas. During the Cold War he opposed every weapon system that would give American the advantage over our Communist opponent.
When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Kerry was against removing him. Kerry was opposed to even protecting Saudi Arabia. Kerry saw no American interests in keeping the world's oil supply out the hands of a fascist madman.
When Kerry's campaign was in dire straits just prior to the Iowa caucuses, Kerry called in a number of liberal media folks and explained to them that had he been president we would have never gone to war against Saddam Hussein. Let us repeat that. He said, "Never." He did not say that he would've gone with French support.
Kerry has been among Israel's harshest critics to audiences other then Jews to whom he denies ever having criticized Israel.
If you like a pro Communist, anti-American anti-Israeli president, and Kerry is your man.
2. What should it matter to the average U.S. citizen if Kerry is pro or anti israel. I don't see any benefits from being pro israel although there is a benefit to being fair to both parties which we don't seem to be. When you are fair to both parties then you have credibility we don't have it. The question should be can Kerry get us some credibility as being a fair arbitrator between both parties or can he at least do a better job than President Bush. I find it troubling when the rhetoric from washington comes back everytime a Israel conducts an attack, builds a wall, and etc, the administration says "we are troubled" or "deeply concerned" by the recent events on the other side. The Palestinians are condemned for every suicide bomber, for every act berated and punished. It makes me wonder who's the hypocrite.
3. I doubt Kerry is pro communist. His wife is a big time capitalist. Just because he does not see communism as inherently evil does not make him pro communist.
4. As of today, there are no weapons of mass destruction the american people were promised. That leads me to believe that as of today, Kerry would have been right not to go to war with Iraq.
5. The U.S. has a technological advantage that is years ahead of the Iraqi's. At a certain point the effectiveness per dollar goes down. Why would you need the most expensive stealth aircraft to do X amount damage when a cheaper aircraft could get the same results and still come home safe.What can make a nigga wanna fight a whole night club/Figure that he ought to maybe be a pimp simply 'cause he don't like love/What can make a nigga wanna achy, break all rules/In a book when it took a lot to get you hooked up to this volume/
What can make a nigga wanna loose all faith in/Anything that he can't feel through his chest wit sensation
Comment
-
Originally posted by Admiral
Many of the weapons systems that Kerry voted against are cash cows whose existence would not positively effect the US's ability to conduct the type of combat operation currently being undertaken.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
Comment