Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Bush bans coverage of Iraq casualties

  1. #1
    King monkspider's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Aug 2001
    Location
    Wichita
    Posts
    1,352

    Local Date
    February 23, 2012
    Local Time
    00:15

    Bush bans coverage of Iraq casualties

    Since the end of the Vietnam War, presidents have worried that their military actions would lose support once the public glimpsed the remains of U.S. soldiers arriving at air bases in flag-draped caskets.



    To this problem, the Bush administration has found a simple solution: It has ended the public dissemination of such images by banning news coverage and photography of dead soldiers' homecomings on all military bases.

    In March, on the eve of the Iraq war, a directive arrived from the Pentagon at U.S. military bases. "There will be no arrival ceremonies for, or media coverage of, deceased military personnel returning to or departing from Ramstein [Germany] airbase or Dover [Del.] base, to include interim stops," the Defense Department said, referring to the major ports for the returning remains.

    A Pentagon spokeswoman said the military-wide policy actually dates from about November 2000 -- the last days of the Clinton administration -- but it apparently went unheeded and unenforced, as images of caskets returning from the Afghanistan war appeared on television broadcasts and in newspapers until early this year. Though Dover Air Force Base, which has the military's largest mortuary, has had restrictions for 12 years, others "may not have been familiar with the policy," the spokeswoman said. This year, "we've really tried to enforce it."

    President Bush's opponents say he is trying to keep the spotlight off the fatalities in Iraq. "This administration manipulates information and takes great care to manage events, and sometimes that goes too far," said Joe Lockhart, who as White House press secretary joined President Bill Clinton at several ceremonies for returning remains. "For them to sit there and make a political decision because this hurts them politically -- I'm outraged."

    Pentagon officials deny that. Speaking on condition of anonymity, they said the policy covering the entire military followed a victory over a civil liberties court challenge to the restrictions at Dover and relieves all bases of the difficult logistics of assembling family members and deciding which troops should get which types of ceremonies.

    One official said only individual graveside services, open to cameras at the discretion of relatives, give "the full context" of a soldier's sacrifice. "To do it at several stops along the way doesn't tell the full story and isn't representative," the official said.

    A White House spokesman said Bush has not attended any memorials or funerals for soldiers killed in action during his presidency as his predecessors had done, although he has met with families of fallen soldiers and has marked the loss of soldiers in Memorial Day and Sept. 11, 2001, remembrances.

    The Pentagon has previously acknowledged the effect on public opinion of the grim tableau of caskets being carried from transport planes to hangars or hearses. In 1999, the then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Henry H. Shelton, said a decision to use military force is based in part on whether it will pass "the Dover test," as the public reacts to fatalities.

    Ceremonies for arriving coffins, not routine during the Vietnam War, became increasingly common and elaborate later. After U.S. soldiers fell in Beirut, Grenada, Panama, the Balkans, Kenya, Afghanistan and elsewhere, the military often invited in cameras for elaborate ceremonies for the returning remains, at Andrews Air Force Base, Dover, Ramstein and elsewhere -- sometimes with the president attending.

    President Jimmy Carter attended ceremonies for troops killed in Pakistan, Egypt and the failed hostage rescue mission in Iran. President Ronald Reagan participated in many memorable ceremonies, including a service at Camp Lejeune in 1983 for 241 Marines killed in Beirut. Among several events at military bases, he went to Andrews in 1985 to pin Purple Hearts to the caskets of marines killed in San Salvador, and, at Mayport Naval Station in Florida in 1987, he eulogized those killed aboard the USS Stark in the Persian Gulf.

    During President George H.W. Bush's term, there were ceremonies at Dover and Andrews for Americans killed in Panama, Lebanon and aboard the USS Iowa.

    But in early 1991, at the time of the Persian Gulf War, the Pentagon said there would be no more media coverage of coffins returning to Dover, the main arrival point; a year earlier, Bush was angered when television networks showed him giving a news briefing on a split screen with caskets arriving.

    But the photos of coffins arriving at Andrews and elsewhere continued to appear through the Clinton administration. In 1996, Dover made an exception to allow filming of Clinton's visit to welcome the 33 caskets with remains from Commerce Secretary Ronald H. Brown's plane crash. In 1998, Clinton went to Andrews to see the coffins of Americans killed in the terrorist bombing in Nairobi. Dover also allowed public distribution of photos of the homecoming caskets after the terrorist attack on the USS Cole in 2000.

    The photos of coffins continued for the first two years of the current Bush administration, from Ramstein and other bases. Then, on the eve of the Iraq invasion, word came from the Pentagon that other bases were to adopt Dover's policy of making the arrival ceremonies off limits.

    "Whenever we go into a conflict, there's a certain amount of guidance that comes down the pike," said Lt. Olivia Nelson, a spokeswoman for Dover. "It's a consistent policy across the board. Where it used to apply only to Dover, they've now made it very clear it applies to everyone."

    (Source: Washington Post)
    ------------------------

    To the conservatives: think up a good way to white-wash this.

    To the liberals: What does this mean for the future?
    http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

  2. #2
    Prince NeOmega's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2002
    Location
    Play Pentagenesis Beta!
    Posts
    351

    Local Date
    February 22, 2012
    Local Time
    21:15
    Nobody is dying in Iraq.... because all those roses the Iraqis are throwing are completely harmless.

    *waves hand a la Obi Wan* "You don't need to see any coffins..."

  3. #3
    King Gatekeeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Feb 2000
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    2,317
    Country
    This is Gatekeeper's Country Flag

    Local Date
    February 22, 2012
    Local Time
    23:15
    **shrug** The one thing that official policies cannot silence are the families.

    Gatekeeper
    "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire

    "Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — Confucius

  4. #4
    Apolyton Grand Executioner MichaeltheGreat's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Oct 1999
    Location
    Fenway Pahk
    Posts
    1,767
    Country
    This is MichaeltheGreat's Country Flag

    Local Date
    February 22, 2012
    Local Time
    22:15
    I should close this as just one more ****ing moronic troll.

    In case you didn't know, dear, CNN at least has a section on their website listing all the KIA's.

    How many have been killed on a daily basis is covered in every major media that I've seen. In fact, it's headline news.

    Not making a spectacle of one and only one aspect of the transfer home of KIA's is hardly "Bush" "banning coverage of Iraqi casualties"

    So tell me this, before I simply make it policy to lock or delete every marginal or lower thread of yours:

    (a) Are you aware of the actual facts surrounding your threads, but choose to lie and exaggerate, i.e. troll?

    (b) Are you simply ignorant of the actual facts surrounding your threads, but post whatever you think sounds good to fit your point of view?

    (c) Do you have an actual reading comprehension problem, and this is the best interpretation you can come up with?
    When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all.

Similar Threads

  1. Iraq War hardly costing any casualties
    By Wiglaf in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: February 7, 2007, 07:43
  2. Bush 'planned Iraq war pre-9/11'
    By The Andy-Man in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 163
    Last Post: January 13, 2004, 19:26
  3. Holy ****! (Iraq) Helo shot down, up to 35 aboard, 20+ casualties
    By MichaeltheGreat in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 338
    Last Post: November 7, 2003, 17:13
  4. coalition casualties in Iraq graphed
    By lord of the mark in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: October 2, 2003, 14:54
  5. Estimated casualties of a war on Iraq: 1 million people!
    By paiktis22 in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 192
    Last Post: January 31, 2003, 00:23

Visitors found this page by searching for:

powered by vBulletin florida military bases

powered by vBulletin us military deaths

powered by vBulletin us military bases in iraq

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •