Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Politics Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
    "Judge Kaplan has already instructed the jury that Trump was found to have sexually assaulted Carroll, and he reiterated that point in a contentious back-and-forth with Habba on Friday, saying, "The fact that Mr. Trump sexually assaulted Ms. Carroll is established." Because of those instructions, the jury’s job will be to decide what further amount, if any, Trump owes Carroll."

    Trump is over $88m for calling his accuser names. The judge told the jury they should consider Trump guilty of rape even though he was never convicted. Rape... Liar... $88m tyvm.

    This was the woman who loved Trump's TV show The Apprentice.
    This is part of the reason I disagree with extending any special respect to judges. They're really just entitled lawyers with power. Of course if I ever have the misfortune to appear in a courtroom I'll kowtow with everyone else but I'd do the same if put before a cartel crime boss.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    "Judge Kaplan has already instructed the jury that Trump was found to have sexually assaulted Carroll, and he reiterated that point in a contentious back-and-forth with Habba on Friday, saying, "The fact that Mr. Trump sexually assaulted Ms. Carroll is established." Because of those instructions, the jury’s job will be to decide what further amount, if any, Trump owes Carroll."

    Trump is over $88m for calling his accuser names. The judge told the jury they should consider Trump guilty of rape even though he was never convicted. Rape... Liar... $88m tyvm.

    This was the woman who loved Trump's TV show The Apprentice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Trump bragged about his sanctions on Venezuela, not long afterward thousands of Venezuelans began showing up at our border. Our sanctions and drug and cold wars turned Latin America into thugocracies run by cartels, gangs, and dictators. Thats why people are knocking at the door, to get out of the shooting gallery we created.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ming
    commented on 's reply
    Gee... if Trump hadn't called his mob to Washington and filled them with lies, it would never have happened.
    But keep trying to find ANYBODY ELSE to blame.

  • Ming
    commented on 's reply
    I was talking about your normal anti Biden crap. You know, the childish go Brandon.
    Your maga underwear is showing again.

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    I agree he should have been more active telling people to leave sooner but whoever was in charge of security let it happen.

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    its been all over the news...or were you talking about the Iraqis asking us to leave

  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Broken_Erika View Post
    I agree that open lack of cooperation between governor Abbott and Biden along with his federal appointees is frequently making it more difficult for border patrol to do parts of their jobs. However, Border Patrol itself is surprisingly mute in it's criticism of Abbott in this regard. That is surprising given they are much freer to criticize Abbott than Biden. It's definitely notable that Border Patrol Council president Brandon Judd is so openly and repeatedly totally supportive of Abbott and that he is also possibly the most immune to presidential retaliation of anyone in Border Patrol. It's most plausible that most of the Border Patrol criticism of Abbott is designed to curry favor with the administration and its appointees while most of the expressions of support for Abbott are likely to be genuine.

    Having said all that, I don't think much of Abbott with respect to border control and illegal immigration (immigrants may not be illegal but immigration certainly can be) especially since he apportions such a large fraction of the resources Texas spends in this regard is spent (wasted really) on zero sum solutions. Overwhelmingly this is spent on bribing migrants who arrive illegally to accept transportation to distant areas of the US. There are also an alarming number of people in his party who want to decrease *legal* immigration and are pushing hard in negotiations for laws and policy changes that would do just that and Greg has said very little to criticize that stupidity and only occasionally speaks in favor of increasing legal immigration for skilled workers which is especially desperately needed now.

    Make no mistake, both conservatives and Progressives are approaching immigration from pure Machiavellian political scheming and calculations that grossly ignores public interest.

    Biden ended Remain in Mexico. this was incredibly stupid and harmful if we want to help immigrants and monitor immigration across the border. Ending it demonstrated he did not care about border control and monitoring. The accusation that he cynically believed the immigrants fleeing from economic ruin and exploitation by areas that had in recent memory been better off under their leftist governments would eventually vote to support his party is difficult to refute as that actually makes a great deal more sense than the official explanation that it was inconsistent with our values. It didn't help either than when illegal border crossings were sky rocketing he pressed to have title 42 lifted and battled it out in court to ensure that would occur.

    Many conservatives have been opposed to increasing legal immigration. This is completely inexplicable economically. Currently the US has a desperate need for more legal immigration especially of skilled workers but it has even become necessary at the totally unskilled labor end of the job market. It's not possible to hide from this fact. Currently in negotiations with the administration on border changes in exchange for spending concessions conservatives are actually demanding changes that would decrease legal immigration, even of skilled workers. That's outrageous and that's stupid. Conservatives have also been wasting resources bribing illegally residing migrants to places they find more politically convenient. While, they may have been inspired by the similar activities by the federal government in the Obama administration (which those conservatives tended to find much less politically convenient), they seem to have forgotten that first Clinton and then Bush did something similar and they didn't seem to complain much at that time. What I find especially loathsome is that while they are willing to do that, they balk at spending public money on social welfare for these desperate impoverished people even though such spending is not zero sum and will at least provide direct benefit.

    Both parties are bad guys on border security and immigration.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Ming View Post
    For the Maga crowd, it was just a peaceful walk in the park. And it was the FBI, democrats and who ever which made it violent.
    But then again, we know how they view reality since they still think Trump won.
    Overall as a 'coup' it was incredibly cowardly and half-arsed. I think the outrageous impeachable offence is that the president literally did *nothing* to end the open conflict between a group he had just asked to go to the capitol and capitol security. I do not think he was willing to lead an actual insurrection in any meaningful sense, he just hoped to trigger a violent conflict that would scare people into making concessions to him. Rather than meaningful insurrection his plan was passive aggressive riot stoking behavior with plausible deniability. He should have been immediately impeached for waiting several hours to even speak publicly to stop it, but let's not kid ourselves that Trump organized this thing as a plan to overthrow the government.

    At this point the focus should be on his cowardice and willingness to sell loyal supporters down the river for cheap political capital, rather than on claims that this was an organized insurrection. "loosely organized" and "nudged" in the modern political sense of "nudge" is a far more accurate description.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    commented on 's reply
    Blessed are the cheese makers

  • Ming
    replied
    You've been watching videos on the internet again...

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    US-Iraq to begin talks for withdrawing troops. Translation, Iraqis are tired of our little war with Iran in their country. And Joe Biden started a war with the Houthis. Lets go, Brandon

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    IDF soldier taken hostage on Oct 7 died in a poison gas attack on the tunnel system. Using poison gas to kill people... hmm. I suppose it dont matter how people die in a war, bullet, drone, 2000 lb bomb, or cruise missile, dead is dead.

    Leave a comment:


  • Broken_Erika
    replied
    U.K. walks away from trade talks with Canada

    ​ Sticking point is how much access U.K. producers should have to the Canadian cheese market

    ​British negotiators walked away from trade talks with Canada Thursday — a dramatic development that taps the brakes on a bilateral trade deal between the two Commonwealth nations that has been years in the making.

    A major sticking point between the two sides remains how much tariff-free access U.K. producers should have to the Canadian cheese market.

    After Brexit, an interim agreement kept tariff-free British cheese on Canadian shelves for three years. That more permissive regime expired at the end of last year.

    Negotiators had been working on a longer-term bilateral trade deal to replace the liberalized trade the U.K. enjoyed under the terms of Canada's Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the European Union.


    In the aftermath of the renegotiation of the former North American Free Trade Agreement, which saw changes to supply-managed sectors, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promised dairy farmers that no more slices of Canada's domestic market would be served up to exporters in future negotiations.

    "We have always said we will only negotiate trade deals that deliver for the British people. And we reserve the right to pause negotiations with any country if progress is not being made," a U.K. government spokesperson said in a statement to CBC News.

    "We remain open to restarting talks with Canada in the future to build a stronger trading relationship that benefits businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic."

    Trade Minister Mary Ng told reporters in Ottawa Thursday afternoon that she had reached out to her British counterpart, Kemi Badenoch, to express Canada's disappointment at their decision to pause the talks.

    "We are at the table. Frankly, I would say that we continue to be at the table," she said. "We're always going to look for the best deal for Canadians. It's what we have always done. And this time is no different."

    Ng insisted Canada wouldn't agree to a deal that wasn't good for Canadian farmers.

    "I'm very confident that we will be able to get back to the table and I would encourage my colleagues in the United Kingdom to get back to the table, because negotiating is how we get a deal," she said, adding that she would rather Canadian officials be talking at the bargaining table than in the media.

    The Dairy Farmers of Canada has said consistently that expanded access to the Canadian dairy sector should remain off the table in trade talks. Automotive negotiations also stalled


    Talks are also faltering on drafting new rules for automotive trade between the two countries.

    European and Canadian-assembled automobiles enjoy preferential access to each other's consumer markets under the CETA that's been in place with the European Union since 2017. The EU deal lays out "rules of origin" that determine what constitutes a European automotive export for the purposes of lowering tariffs into Canada.
    ​
    Since the United Kingdom is no longer part of the European Union, those rules expire on March 1. Exports from the now-independent British automotive industry are set to lose their preferential access to the Canadian market.

    Automotive trade in and out of Canada is subject to a tangled web of trade agreements, each with different rules: CETA for the EU, the revised North American trade agreement for the U.S. and Mexico (known as CUSMA), the Comprehensive and Progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership that liberalized automotive trade with Japan, and Canada's bilateral trade agreement with South Korea.

    British vehicles risk landing outside these competitive, tariff-free supply chains if the two sides can't find a way forward. Riskier for U.K. than for Canada?


    Failure to reach a deal with Canada before these cheese and automotive deadlines pass could hurt British exports. From Canada's strategic perspective, there's less immediate economic urgency to reach a deal.

    In fact, holding out responds to a key demand from Canadian livestock producers, who have urged the Canadian government not to agree to any new trade deal with the United Kingdom until food inspection standards are harmonized to recognize Canadian food safety rules as equivalent to British rules.

    A specific quantity of Canadian beef and pork exports was supposed to gain access to the European and British markets when CETA took effect, but imports have been held to practically zero because Canadian standards aren't recognized as compliant.

    Ng told reporters that this friction in the bilateral talks with the U.K. is a issue separate from Canada's ratification process for the British to join the CPTPP. The final terms and text for that accession were agreed to in the summer, but each current party to that trade agreement must undergo its own ratification process. In Canada, that will require a parliamentary consultation process at committee and the passage of implementation legislation before cabinet ratifies the expanded treaty.

    Ng said that at the moment, the government is focused on ratification of the revised Canada-Ukraine trade agreement — that bill has yet to clear Parliament.

    In the absence of the bespoke bilateral agreement these negotiations were trying to land, Canada's current trade continuity agreement with the United Kingdom will stand indefinitely to keep tariffs off other products shipping between the two countries. But this "CETA rollover" deal was intended to be only a transitional arrangement until something more comprehensive could be worked out.

    Negotiators have completed eight rounds of talks since 2022 and were scheduled to meet next month in the U.K. Those meetings now will not proceed.

    The United Kingdom is Canada's third-largest trading partner, worth over $46 billion in two-way goods and services trade in 2022.
    ​https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/can...eese-1.7094817

    Increased UK Cheese access would anger the Dairy Cartel/Cheese Mafia/Canadian Dairy Commission

    Leave a comment:


  • Broken_Erika
    commented on 's reply
    Probably a bit of hyperbole since i was drinking when i wrote that.
Working...
X