Politics Thread

[Berzerker]

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1751310414460190937

X fact checks Snopes

Joe Biden wore a construction helmet backwards, Snopes said 'false'.

[Dauphin]

If Trump wants to clear his name, maybe he can counter-sue Carroll for defamation by her saying that he sexually assaulted her. He won't win, but he can try.

[-Jrabbit]

Oh, well, if "Travis on X" says so, that's all we need to hear.

[-Jrabbit]

You're the one asking why Trump's not in jail.

[Ming]

Let's be clear... A jury found that he had sexually abused her and defamed her in the first trial.
Your comment that he couldn't get a fair trail is total opinion and BS. He lost the case based on the FACTS. The jury did their job.
The law was changed to remove the statue of limitations to help VICTIMS, NOT to prosecute Trump as you imply.
And he wasn't just claiming he was innocent.. He went totally overboard and to this day continues attacking her, even after two losses in court (talk about a total moron)
And I see you failed to mention all the other women who have claimed similar activities on his part.

But as usual, you defend him by just reposting things you've seen in internet videos as if it was all true.
For a person who "claims" he doesn't like Trump, you sure defend him all the time... even when he's acting like a total ass.

[Berzerker]

"Let’s clear this E Jean Carroll situation up for everyone who doesn’t understand how things work:

- Trump has never been convicted or even investigated for what she accused him of.
- She doesn’t know what year it happened, and has even been caught in a few lies.
- She brought the dress forward, but the dress didn’t even exist in the years she claimed it happened.
- Trump was not on trial for this. He was on trial for calling her a liar and other names.
- The Jury is from a far left district, so Trump had no shot at a fair hearing.
- She didn’t make these accusations until 20 years later. She even said she fantasizes about it happening before.
- The only reason she could even sue was because democrats changed the laws for 1 year in New York. The law was changed the day Trump got out of office.
- She wasn’t going to sue until anti Trump people talked her into it and offered to pay."

from Travis on X

and she just loved his show The Apprentice

[Berzerker]

That's just it. Civil lawsuits don't require "proving"; anything but they want to use them to establish precedent and determination of fact as if it does.

You're a bridge to reality

[Berzerker]

Tell it to Ming, he's the one claiming Trump was found guilty of sexual assault.

[Berzerker]

The person in charge of security is to blame... And Ray Epps and his crew who led the charge at the breach site

[Berzerker]

Joe didn't start a war with the Houthis? He's bombing them for interfering with Israel's slaughter in Gaza. Imagine that. We sure dont like other people getting in the way of our wars.

[Berzerker]

I defend truth

[Berzerker]

I have to agree with the states. The feds wont do their job so Texas is next in line. If the state wont act border counties and cities have jurisdiction over illegal entry. Actually they dont need to wait, they dont need my permission to protect themselves. The border states should be in charge with federal funding.

[Dauphin]

As JR says, he is not being prevented from protesting innocence. He is not paying out because of his claims of innocence, but because of the attacks on Carroll's character that are malicious. The jury verdict explicitly stated Trumps statements were false, and were actual malice. The verdict form answers yes to the question:

In making the statements, Mr Trump acted maliciously, out of hatred, ill-will, spite or wanton, reckless, or willful disregard of the rights of another?

[-Jrabbit]

Big difference between "protesting one's innocence" and making additional defamation attacks.

[-Jrabbit]

Dude, it's a civil trial, not criminal. Get a freaking grip.