The Witch Hunt Revealed

[rah]

The word of the day:

Used in a sentence:

"The members of the Apolyton OT are enjoying a nice, hot cup of schadenfreude at Kidicious's expense."

Normally I would just feel disappointment that this was happening to a president, but I have to admit that because of the total buffoonery of his supporters "like kid" this does provide a feeling of schadenfreude.

[BeBMan]

Rah made the call!

Tweeted by Dotard the 1st, President Very Stable Genius, Donald "Bone Spurs" Trump:

"If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!"

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...992023040?s=19

I liked this one:

[Giancarlo]

That depends on the law. Some laws intention counts. It is the same with the law regarding Clinton email scandal, although they didn't investigate that case with the intention of prosecuting.

But... Hillary...

She is free and not charged of any crime as she didn't commit any crime. Meanwhile two of Trumps closest friends and allies are going to jail.

You are so desperate its pathetic.

[JohnT]

God, did you steal that from a trump tweet?

Just pathetic.

Rah made the call!

Tweeted by Dotard the 1st, President Very Stable Genius, Donald "Bone Spurs" Trump:

"If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!"

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1032247043992023040?s=19

[Giancarlo]

The way I understand it the plea deal wasn't structured the way it would be if they planned on using Cohen as a witness. Cohen himself said that the President didn't tell him to do it. Plus he's a total sleaze.

The other matter is that the law says that you must know that you are violating the law. Cohen was his lawyer. Did Cohen tell him that it's violating the law. Don't think so.

But fake news will say otherwise because none of that helps them perpetuate the hoax.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/michael-cohen-information-interest-robert-mueller-lawyer-says-111707823--abc-news-topstories.html

Wrong.

And Cohen directly implicated Trump in a felony while under oath. Read what I have posted you clown.

Cohen was Trumps attorney for years and did a number of illegal activities at Trumps behest. Trump knew everything about it.

[Proteus_MST]

Well he's not only a bad lawyer, he's a very bad person, and a liar. ....

Sounds like an ideal companion for Trump then

[JohnT]

The word of the day:

Used in a sentence:

"The members of the Apolyton OT are enjoying a nice, hot cup of schadenfreude at Kidicious's expense."

[rah]

Well he's not only a bad lawyer, he's a very bad person, and a liar.

God, did you steal that from a trump tweet?

Just pathetic.

[Kidlicious]

SQUIRREL!

Eh, there are none so blind as those who will not see, right, Child?

I actually pointed out that you are purposefully posting nonsense as if it were relevant. Nvm though I guess, since you are too stupid to know how stupid you are.

[Kidlicious]

Tfw your best defense of the President's lawyer pleading to crimes is:

1. A lie (Cohen most definitely said the President told him to "do it")
2. Another lie (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and all that)
3. To call the President's lawyer a sleaze (who hires sleazes for lawyers?)
4. To call the President's lawyer a bad lawyer (... well, gotta admit Child, you actually got something right with this one)

Well he's not only a bad lawyer, he's a very bad person, and a liar. So they need something besides his word. Burden of proof.

[rah]

This thread title needs to be changed to "another one bites the dust"

Donnie cannot not escape some type of charges now.

I love kid's "but but he didn't know"

[Kidlicious]

It does?
In germany the saying goes: "Ignorance doesn't protect you from punishment"

i.e. even if you didn't know you broke a law, you will be indicted and may get punished for it (although the degree of penalty may get reduced if you can successfully prove that you broke the law without knowing it)

That depends on the law. Some laws intention counts. It is the same with the law regarding Clinton email scandal, although they didn't investigate that case with the intention of prosecuting.

[JohnT]

The way I understand it the plea deal wasn't structured the way it would be if they planned on using Cohen as a witness. Cohen himself said that the President didn't tell him to do it. Plus he's a total sleaze.

The other matter is that the law says that you must know that you are violating the law. Cohen was his lawyer. Did Cohen tell him that it's violating the law. Don't think so.

But fake news will say otherwise because none of that helps them perpetuate the hoax.

Tfw your best defense of the President's lawyer pleading to crimes is:

1. A lie (Cohen most definitely said the President told him to "do it")
2. Another lie (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and all that)
3. To call the President's lawyer a sleaze (who hires sleazes for lawyers?)
4. To call the President's lawyer a bad lawyer (... well, gotta admit Child, you actually got something right with this one)

[Proteus_MST]

...
The other matter is that the law says that you must know that you are violating the law. Cohen was his lawyer. Did Cohen tell him that it's violating the law. Don't think so.
....

It does?
In germany the saying goes: "Ignorance doesn't protect you from punishment"

i.e. even if you didn't know you broke a law, you will be indicted and may get punished for it (although the degree of penalty may get reduced if you can successfully prove that you broke the law without knowing it)

[JohnT]

SQUIRREL!

Eh, there are none so blind as those who will not see, right, Child?