The Witch Hunt Revealed

[Giancarlo]

Well stop the presses. Why, did someone collude with Russia? No they lied to the FBI!

Actually there is clear collusion that did occur between the Trump campaign and Russia, including the meetings, the public request to hack the DNC and so forth. This is as clear as day.

And this investigation hasn't cost anything. The President's closest allies and friends are under criminal investigation and have either been indicted or taken plea bargains. Russians hackers were also indicted in absentia as part of this investigation (that in itself shows Russian involvement in the election and potential collusion).

This isn't a lie, kidiot. This is reality. There has been a substantial number of convictions, indictments and plea bargains. Trump's friend and business partner of 30+ years was convicted on 8 charges (resulting in anywhere from 7-40 years in prison depending on sentencing recommendations), and pled guilty to two charges regarding the charges of being a foreign agent (before and during the election campaign).

Nobody misled America, except Trump himself who is under active criminal investigation.

These are just the plain facts you're going to have to deal with in the upcoming months. We're in September and once we hit October... more surprises are going to pop up, especially before the midterm elections when the republican party takes a royal beating.

[Proteus_MST]

Do you think this investigation costs nothing? Do you think it's ok to investigate the President because you didn't vote for him? When you assign a special investigator people think you have evidence. It's a lie. They had no evidence. They misled America.

Atually the investigation currently is about 30 mio $ in plus, thanks to Manaforts asset forfeiture ... it is an investigation that actually earns money.
Totally in contrast to the witch hunts against Hillary and Obama, which took longer than the Mueller investigation, yielded no results and actually costs the taxpayers money

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/17/muel...rt-assets.html

[Kidlicious]

People are already saying that Trump is bad for not releasing information to them. THEY DON'T WANT TO KNOW!

[Kidlicious]

It’s almost as if the investigation is an investigation of what happened... rather than a trial based on proof gathered in an investigation. How weird is that?

Do you think this investigation costs nothing? Do you think it's ok to investigate the President because you didn't vote for him? When you assign a special investigator people think you have evidence. It's a lie. They had no evidence. They misled America.

[Kidlicious]

You serious?!

[Aeson]

How about his tax returns?

[Aeson]

It’s almost as if the investigation is an investigation of what happened... rather than a trial based on proof gathered in an investigation. How weird is that?

[Kidlicious]

The President has authorized the release of many documents that they did not want the public to see.

[Kidlicious]

This is the way John Solomon at The Hill puts it ...

So, by the words of Comey, Strzok and Page, we now know that the Trump Justice Department — through Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — unleashed the Mueller special counsel probe before the FBI could validate a connection between Trump and Russia.

Which raises the question: If there was no concrete evidence of collusion, why did we need a special counsel?

[Kidlicious]

hoo boy


linkavitch

Well stop the presses. Why, did someone collude with Russia? No they lied to the FBI!

[Kidlicious]

I guess you refer to this passage in the article:


In this case, it doesn't say that Lisa "testified that they had nothing on Trump when Mueller was appointed", but rather that one of the lawmakers who intrerviewed her had the impression that her words indicate that there was no evidence.

Big difference.

Just like the difference between Trump constantly giving us the impression that he is Puting toyboy / sub ... and Trump actually admitting that he is

No. Her own words are in the article

"It still existed in the scope of possibility that there would be literally nothing, probably not nothing nothing, as we probably knew more than that by that point," she went on to say. "But in the scheme of the possible outcomes, the most serious one obviously being crimes serious enough to warrant impeachment; but on the other scale that, you know, maybe an unwitting person was, in fact, involved in the release of information, but it didn't ultimately touch any senior, you know, people in the administration or on the campaign. And so the text just sort of reflects that spectrum

[self biased]

senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) said on Sunday that lying to the FBI is not “a big event,” while discussing the ongoing investigation into collusion between the campaign team of Donald Trump and Russia.

Speaking with CBS host John Dickerson on “Face the Nation,” Graham said: “from the judiciary point of view, we found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

Pressed by Dickerson about his perspective on the progress of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the president’s associates, Graham downplayed recent convictions and plea deals. In particular, he said that former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos’s guilty plea to a charge of lying to the FBI was not that significant.

hoo boy


linkavitch

[Giancarlo]

In other words, Ratcliffe is lying about what was said. Just another spin artist like Devin Nunes.

[Giancarlo]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...pointed-report

Diarrhea source.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Examiner

Washington Examiner is a far right tabloid owned by Clarity media. A company owned by Philip Anschutz. A Christian conservative billionaire with his own agenda to peddle. He is anti gay, anti women and pro gun. Also has extensive ties to Rupert Murdoch. Hardly credible.

How many indictments do we need? Manaforts plea bargain should be concerning to you.

[Proteus_MST]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...pointed-report

I guess you refer to this passage in the article:

...
In a statement to Fox News, Ratcliffe said he "cannot provide the specifics of a confidential interview," before adding: "But I can say that Lisa Page left me with the impression, based on her own words, that the lead investigator of the Russian collusion case, Peter Strzok, had found no evidence of collusion after nearly a year."
...

In this case, it doesn't say that Lisa "testified that they had nothing on Trump when Mueller was appointed", but rather that one of the lawmakers who intrerviewed her had the impression that her words indicate that there was no evidence.

Big difference.

Just like the difference between Trump constantly giving us the impression that he is Puting toyboy / sub ... and Trump actually admitting that he is