The Witch Hunt Revealed

[BlackCat]

We know that because Lisa Page testified to that under oath.

[Proteus_MST]

This is the piece from March 2017...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/u...n-hacking.html

Remember there in NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. We know that because Lisa Page testified to that under oath.

Dunno what Lisa Page has testified ... but AFAIK she is no part of the Mueller investigation anymore since almost 1.5 years
(i.e. since republicans openly complained about the texts between her and Strzok)

Therefore she cannot know what evidence Mueller has uncovered since then
(i.e. during a time that Mueller found out lots of republican witches around Trump and got them to sing)

[Kidlicious]

This is the piece from March 2017...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html

Remember there in NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. We know that because Lisa Page testified to that under oath.

[Kidlicious]

Maybe this is true about Flynn ... maybe there is a lot of evidence they have about Flynn, that we don't know about ... making him pleading guilty the logical step

Maybe the same also is true about Donnie and the others in his circle.

It is funny how you always assume there is more than we know, if it comes to democrats (or non Trumpist republicans, or people working in the Mueller investigation), but never when it comes to Donnie and those around him

That's ridiculous. You still think Flynn is a conspirator after Mueller recommended no jail time?

They have ALL of Hillary's emails, and we know they are investigating the CF.

[-Jrabbit]

"A lot of evidence that they have that we don't know about"?
Sounds like the Mueller investigation.

[-Jrabbit]

No one prosecutes after a guilty plea.
"How do you plead?"
"Guilty."
Done.

[-Jrabbit]

I thought the NYT was fake news and we shouldn't believe anything they say. Pick a lane, son.

[-Jrabbit]

He was interviewed as part of the Russia investigation because he led the transition team and was Trump's National Security advisor.
Not interviewing him would have been dereliction of duty.

[-Jrabbit]

No, I'm stating facts. You should try it sometime.

[-Jrabbit]

No. That was not an accusation; it was an observation. I watched as Hannity and his guests talked about THEIR Deep State conspiracy theory, the night the Flynn "no time" recommendation was announced. It's not my theory. I find it laughable, and I certainly don't believe it. Try again, beyotch.

[Proteus_MST]

People are prosecuted for doing what she did. Plus there is a lot more to that. There is a lot of evidence that they have that we don't know about.

Maybe this is true about Flynn ... maybe there is a lot of evidence they have about Flynn, that we don't know about ... making him pleading guilty the logical step

Maybe the same also is true about Donnie and the others in his circle.

It is funny how you always assume there is more than we know, if it comes to democrats (or non Trumpist republicans, or people working in the Mueller investigation), but never when it comes to Donnie and those around him

[Kidlicious]

I could ask you the same about Hillary Clinton?
Why do you care at all whether or not she gets persecuted for the russian hacking of her eMails?

People are prosecuted for doing what she did. Plus there is a lot more to that. There is a lot of evidence that they have that we don't know about.

[Kidlicious]

Maybe because it is a crime
And if he lied about it, that is a crime as well.

But we get it... you think however your masters want you to think

What part of "... never prosecuted" don't you understand?

[Kidlicious]

I found a NYTimes article that outlines the whole set up and proves the media knew everything. I'm posting it today.

[Ming]

Why was he interviewed for a crime that is never prosecuted? And why should we care if he lied?

Maybe because it is a crime
And if he lied about it, that is a crime as well.

But we get it... you think however your masters want you to think