Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Witch Hunt Revealed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    It wouldn't say that. Do you even know what the FD-302 form is?

  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    The FBI/government has tapes that he talked to the Russians and Flynn admitted he talked to the Russians about retaliation and not condemning Israel.

    In the document he lies and says that he didn't talk to the Russians about retaliation and about 'not doing something'.

    The tapes were heard by people both in the WH and the Post. I do not know if you can listen to the tapes, however, Flynn has admitted to both talking to the Russians about retaliation/etc and to lying to the FBI so I am a bit confused about what you believe happened. Do you believe there are no tapes?

    https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/0...es-a-new-tell/ .

    JM
    The question is did Flynn hamper the FBI from doing an investigation. The FBI must be doing a legit investigation. Comey has already admitted that he did something wrong by sending agents to investigate. What were they investigating? The Logan Act?

    Yes, they have tapes. In fact Flynn knew that. We have docs that prove that. Why were they asking him questions that they already had the answers to.

    Flynn told them that he didn't remember. That is not the same thing as lying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    That document doesn't say that Flynn lied. In fact the agents that created that document said that they didn't think Flynn lied. Who told you that that document says that Flynn lied?
    The FBI/government has tapes that he talked to the Russians and Flynn admitted he talked to the Russians about retaliation and not condemning Israel.

    In the document he lies and says that he didn't talk to the Russians about retaliation and about 'not doing something'.

    The tapes were heard by people both in the WH and the Post. I do not know if you can listen to the tapes, however, Flynn has admitted to both talking to the Russians about retaliation/etc and to lying to the FBI so I am a bit confused about what you believe happened. Do you believe there are no tapes?

    https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/0...es-a-new-tell/ .

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    Like this document, showing that Flynn lied to the FBI?

    JM
    That document doesn't say that Flynn lied. In fact the agents that created that document said that they didn't think Flynn lied. Who told you that that document says that Flynn lied?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    Yes. You had a source (Fox News?) tell you that there was no original 302 and no reason given for why it was filed months later. You used this to say that everything was 'fake' and that it was a witch hunt. Your source (Fox News?) was wrong, you were wrong to believe them. There was an original 302 and it was not filed months later.

    When will you realize that your source (Fox News?) is providing you lies?

    JM
    No I didn't. I said that Mueller didn't submit the original 302 (at that date which was the deadline set by the judge.).

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

    Like what?
    Like this document, showing that Flynn lied to the FBI?

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

    The 14th comes before the 17th.
    Yes. You had a source (Fox News?) tell you that there was no original 302 and no reason given for why it was filed months later. You used this to say that everything was 'fake' and that it was a witch hunt. Your source (Fox News?) was wrong, you were wrong to believe them. There was an original 302 and it was not filed months later.

    When will you realize that your source (Fox News?) is providing you lies?

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    Apparently none? All the information that comes back verifies what I have been told.

    JM
    Like what?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

    Might ask you the same thing. Do you realize how many lies you have been told about this?
    Apparently none? All the information that comes back verifies what I have been told.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    December 14.

    JM
    The 14th comes before the 17th.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    Kid, is there anything that you have been told that if it turns out to be incorrect will make you no longer believe the sources that you use?

    JM
    Might ask you the same thing. Do you realize how many lies you have been told about this?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    No original 302 was submitted, and no explanation.
    December 14. This is based on your source of information (reddit? Q? Fox News?) which now seems to be entirely unreliable. I wouldn't believe anything more that they present to you.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    According to the 302 Flynn lied about telling the Russians not to retaliate for the expulsion of their diplomats?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    Yes, that is when they gave it to the judge. The document that they gave to the judge has an entry date of 2/15/17.

    JM
    And what day did I make that post?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Yes, that is when they gave it to the judge. The document that they gave to the judge has an entry date of 2/15/17 (with a copy having an entry date of 5/31/17). The copy was put in because there had been an error in the original (it called itself a DRAFT DOCUMENT).

    JM

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X