Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Witch Hunt Revealed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • spambot
    replied
    He may not be a traitor, but he still lied to the FBI.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by pchang View Post
    Interesting defense there. Walking something back does not mean one did not say it in the first place.
    I understand. "Fake news" is a difficult concept.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    replied
    Interesting defense there. Walking something back does not mean one did not say it in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    https://www.vox.com/2018/12/18/18146...-mueller-judge

    A planned sentencing hearing for Michael Flynn took an unexpected turn Tuesday, as Judge Emmet Sullivan harshly criticized the former national security adviser — so harshly that Flynn eventually asked for the sentencing to be postponed.


    JM
    There is a very bad lie in that report, that the judge called him a traitor. The judge walked that back. False reporting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Flynn didn't sell his country out. He's no traitor. That's horse****. I don't know why the judge would say that. Not ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    https://www.vox.com/2018/12/18/18146...-mueller-judge

    A planned sentencing hearing for Michael Flynn took an unexpected turn Tuesday, as Judge Emmet Sullivan harshly criticized the former national security adviser — so harshly that Flynn eventually asked for the sentencing to be postponed.


    JM
    Flynn did not lie about contact with the Russian ambassador. Now you are posting false reporting. Flynn admitted to talking to the ambassador according to the 302.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnT
    replied
    Nothing says legitimate charity like being required to donate to actual organizations by a court order.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied


    A planned sentencing hearing for Michael Flynn took an unexpected turn Tuesday, as Judge Emmet Sullivan harshly criticized the former national security adviser — so harshly that Flynn eventually asked for the sentencing to be postponed.


    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post
    The judge in the Flynn case even went out of his way to disprove the Fox conspiracy theory today. He even got Flynn to, line by line, admit it was all untrue.



    Remember, this is a right wing Republican judge and he just smashed Kid's talking points.
    Look idiot. You're the one with the conspiracy theory, that Flynn was a Russian agent and that Trump ordered him to talk to the Russians. Me calling you a tin fool hat moron is not s conspiracy theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...obe/index.html

    Just read what the judge said; calling him a traitor who was working for Russia.
    No dimwit. Another stupid conspiracy theory. Did you get dropped on your head as a child?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied


    Just read what the judge said; calling him a traitor who was working for Russia.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    replied
    Kid is a total dupe of Russian misinformation campaigns, first during the election and now during the investigations. Makes one wonder about all those claims of being and EX- communist. Kid being a deep cover Putin mole would explain so much.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    The judge in the Flynn case even went out of his way to disprove the Fox conspiracy theory today. He even got Flynn to, line by line, admit it was all untrue.



    Remember, this is a right wing Republican judge and he just smashed Kid's talking points.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    Initially you claimed that the late dated 302 was a sign of some prosecutorial misconduct and that Flynn was really, somehow, innocent.

    Now you claim that there was prosecutorial misconduct because there existed an original 302 which was the same as the originally submitted one but had Draft as it's title (And obviously an earlier date) which was not originally submitted. That is not prosecutorial misconduct.

    The whole interest in this was fake news. The claim that there was prosecutorial misconduct was fake news.

    JM
    Fox news didn't report that. They didn't even report that the original 302 was not submitted. I looked at the docs and noticed that the original was not included.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Initially you claimed that the late dated 302 was a sign of some prosecutorial misconduct and that Flynn was really, somehow, innocent.

    Now you claim that there was prosecutorial misconduct because there existed an original 302 which was the same as the originally submitted one but had Draft as it's title (And obviously an earlier date) which was not originally submitted. That is not prosecutorial misconduct.

    The whole interest in this was fake news. The claim that there was prosecutorial misconduct was fake news.

    JM

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X