Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Witch Hunt Revealed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ming
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    She's proven guilty. I'm not going to bother with your denialism. It's a waste of time.
    Coming for the guy who bought into the "covid will disappear soon" MANY TIMES and still thinks Trump won the election along with all the other lies Trump told and the sound bites from his fake news alt right sites

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    She's proven guilty. I'm not going to bother with your denialism. It's a waste of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Kid really, HRC emails? NOBODY CARES. Judicial Watch has been attacking the Clintons nonstop since the mid-90s. Yet today, the entire GOP is telling for us to "move on" with zero repercussions for the attempted overthrow of the US government.

    That is 100% BS hypocrisy.

    Trump lost, fair and square. He had 4 YEARS to prepare for the election - and make no mistake, he did, becoming the first POTUS to declare his candidacy for reelection the day he took office. But, despite a billion-dollar war chest and an army of lawyers, HE LOST.
    Then he had over 2 months to make his case, yet could not find a way to overturn the results America voted for.
    To quote you 4 years ago, GET OVER IT, LOSER.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    commented on 's reply
    You seriously don't know why they haven't been indicted? Wow. I have to spell everything out for you and you still never get it. Why is that?

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    And yet, no charges. No indictments. Why not?

    Because all we've got is naïve gulls like Kidicious, believing what they are told to.

  • Egbert
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Acting like this was just an investigation is flat out denial. This was a spy operation. And it would be one thing if they intended to keep the country safe. But that wasn't their intention. Their motivation was to cover up for Hilary and to attack the President. Our own government attacked the President in the worst kind of way. And so they attacked America.

    To talk about all of this as though it is about a legitimate investigation and some low level guy made an error is disgusting.

    I can't wait for a movie to be made. The storyline sounds awesome. I hope the aliens at Area 32 were involved for some good flying saucer battle scenes. And North Korea for some Kim Jong Un nuclear explosion scenes. Imagine it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Witness testified under oath that HRC was warned twice about using her blackberry phone to transfer classified information. Go to 17:00

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Acting like this was just an investigation is flat out denial. This was a spy operation. And it would be one thing if they intended to keep the country safe. But that wasn't their intention. Their motivation was to cover up for Hilary and to attack the President. Our own government attacked the President in the worst kind of way. And so they attacked America.

    To talk about all of this as though it is about a legitimate investigation and some low level guy made an error is disgusting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    No. Hillary is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. There is even evidence that she knew that what she was doing was criminal and she kept doing it. Comey said that she was too stupid to know that what she was doing was criminal but that was a lie. We now have evidence that it was, obtained by Judicial Watch through a court case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Dp

    Leave a comment:


  • Proteus_MST
    commented on 's reply
    They did find a lot of things, including a meeting of DOnald jr. and others of the Trump campaign with a Kremlin linked lawyer in the Trump hotel.

    Also, HRC was investigated for a much longer time than Trump, with way less results than you got from the shorter investigation into Trump and his campaign

  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post

    In this case, the one they found that was relevant (and they aren't going to look at/for mistakes that hurt the cause. If you have a statistical sample after looking everywhere of one, it means that (1) there was very few mistakes or errors or bad activity and (2) it is a coin flip which way the mistake went.

    And Page was never indicted or convicted, so why are you concerned about his guilt? The mistake was that the last two of the four FISA wiretaps probably would not have been provided (but this is only probable, since we can't go back in time and provide everything to the court again). Note that everyone agrees that he would have had the wiretap from October 2016 to March 2017. Note that this was all of the relevant time anyway... Flynn was dismissed in February.



    There are plenty of people who don't like Trump, the majority of the country. Including many Republicans (most of which have now lost their offices, but that doesn't mean that they were not/are not Republicans). What the above means is that he is not and Obama administration official. He does not provide any evidence in favor of 'Russiagate' or actions by the Obama administration against the Trump campaign or anything of that sort.

    JM
    It's hard to believe that anyone would fall for the Russia Hoax in the first place, which you did. But now you're falling for the cover up hoax, which is like a sequel. Or maybe you just perpetrate the hoaxes. It's hard to believe anyone could be that stupid.

    They investigated a presidential candidate for years with no evidence. We know that HRC made the whole thing up to cover up her scandal. But you claim to believe that you think this is all about some low level person making an error? Berzerker might think you are that stupid, but not me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    Clinesmith was not a member of the Obama administration and there is no evidence linking him to the Obama administration. Your accusation of the Obama administration weaponizing the FBI has no evidence in favor of it and a lot of evidence opposed (see Comey et al. who were the actual contact points between the Obama administration and the FBI).



    Finding minor mistakes that impact things would be pretty common in any long term investigation. That is why investigations are normally not opened without good cause. It becomes arbitrary and politically motivated punishment otherwise. In the ideal world there would be no mistakes, but this isn't the ideal world.

    I don't understand your bias Berzerker. You are not a Trumpist like Kid or Lancer.

    JM
    (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...0c2_story.html if you look at his age, he likely started working for the FBI during the Clinton or Bush administrations)
    This is so ridiculous.

    First of all, I'm not outraged by this scandal because I voted for Trump. That's a stupid insult designed to discredit people and protect all of these corrupt people. Shame on you for attacking people like that for exposing corrupt government scandals.

    Second, there never was any evidence. They conducted this investigation for years with no evidence. That's a scandal of epic proportion. That's not Clinesmith. That's the government, the media, and the Democrats like Adam Schiff. You continue to protect crooks in ridiculous fashion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buster Crabbe's Uncle
    commented on 's reply
    Good riddance. I had your back once, and you made me ashamed for that. Have some original thoughts not off Breitbart-Stormfront-whatever Nazis before you come back to slime us soem moar.

  • Uncle Sparky
    commented on 's reply
    Trump is a Russian stacking doll!
Working...
X