Tweet
OS/2: dead again
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco (andrew.orlowski at theregister.co.uk)
Published Friday 15th July 2005 02:01 GMT
On Tuesday, IBM formally announced that it would cease marketing (http://www-306.ibm.com/fcgi-bin/comm...97/ENUS905-163) OS/2 at the end of next year.
This might cause wry amusement among the operating system's remaining enthusiasts, who maintain that IBM really never started marketing OS/2 in the first place.
These death notices are almost an annual occurrence now. IBM ceased serious development on OS/2 in 1996, told regular users to shove off (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/05...to_os_2_users/) five years ago, and we've already run our valedictory (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12...ewell_then_os/), which leaves little more to add.
IBM has told its customers they'll continue to receive support, provided they pay for it - unlike Windows NT 4.0, or Windows 2000, we might add. That's because IBM tries to stick by Thomas Watson's 1956 edict that the company will honor a promise to its customers "no matter what the cost" - and one global credit card company continues to rely on OS/2.
(Microsoft's equivalent promise seems to be "start a weblog about it, regardless of the cost". But that's touchy-feely modern marketing for you, where what you say is supposed to carry more weight than what you actually do.)
We tracked down one OS/2 developer today in the twilight world of embedded networking systems, where OS/2 has lived on. It's no big deal, he told us.
"I mean TCP/IP and SNA are not going to stop working, are they?," he told us. "Well, I bloody hope not."
German vendor eComStation continues to provide extended support.
IBM agreed damages with Microsoft over the latter's exclusionary tactics designed to keep OS/2 from being a success. ®
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco (andrew.orlowski at theregister.co.uk)
Published Friday 15th July 2005 02:01 GMT
On Tuesday, IBM formally announced that it would cease marketing (http://www-306.ibm.com/fcgi-bin/comm...97/ENUS905-163) OS/2 at the end of next year.
This might cause wry amusement among the operating system's remaining enthusiasts, who maintain that IBM really never started marketing OS/2 in the first place.
These death notices are almost an annual occurrence now. IBM ceased serious development on OS/2 in 1996, told regular users to shove off (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/05...to_os_2_users/) five years ago, and we've already run our valedictory (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12...ewell_then_os/), which leaves little more to add.
IBM has told its customers they'll continue to receive support, provided they pay for it - unlike Windows NT 4.0, or Windows 2000, we might add. That's because IBM tries to stick by Thomas Watson's 1956 edict that the company will honor a promise to its customers "no matter what the cost" - and one global credit card company continues to rely on OS/2.
(Microsoft's equivalent promise seems to be "start a weblog about it, regardless of the cost". But that's touchy-feely modern marketing for you, where what you say is supposed to carry more weight than what you actually do.)
We tracked down one OS/2 developer today in the twilight world of embedded networking systems, where OS/2 has lived on. It's no big deal, he told us.
"I mean TCP/IP and SNA are not going to stop working, are they?," he told us. "Well, I bloody hope not."
German vendor eComStation continues to provide extended support.
IBM agreed damages with Microsoft over the latter's exclusionary tactics designed to keep OS/2 from being a success. ®