different unit strenght on different landscape

[samurai]

I think it`s idiotic that a tank got the same strengt attacing a forrest or plains.Infantery in the forest would be a lot more effective.

This would make the game more realistic, and a lot more fun because you would have to see what kind of landscape that was around you to find out what units you should build to defend your territory, not just a lot of war walkers and some machine gunners.

You would also need different stacs of unit if you want to invade an area with different sorts of tiles.

[Bartemans]

hi,

I agree (again Samurai,

Why only give certain terrain types DEFENSE bonuses?
An offense bonus should be allowed too.

For example: cannons etc. should get a accuracy bonus, while firing from a hill or a mountain (I know, with roads on it), since the cannoneers have a good view. Or an extra-far bombing, for example allowing cannons to fire over a tile. This would make terrain types of more strategic importance. Also the visions of units should improve when they are on mountains/hills.
The reason is quite clear. These proposals should also count for cities.

Bye,

Bartemans
http://home.hccnet.nl/stolte.1