what did people think of this: having corruption tied to low cultural influence, so instead of just having the palace and forbidden palpace stem corruption, have any city with high cultural influence stem corruption.
this would mean that to maintain low corruption the player either has to wait a long time in low production rate cities to build improvements and raise the cultural influence, or plan a strategy where the outermost city is always built up with high culture, to act as a bridge.
plus, what was said about the idea of instead of a large number of troops disappearing at a cultural reversion, either units being damaged or population being cut per turn of unrest.
this would mean that to maintain low corruption the player either has to wait a long time in low production rate cities to build improvements and raise the cultural influence, or plan a strategy where the outermost city is always built up with high culture, to act as a bridge.
plus, what was said about the idea of instead of a large number of troops disappearing at a cultural reversion, either units being damaged or population being cut per turn of unrest.