Does anyone in here find the City Radius concept detestful
Hehe, didn't mean to be so harsh on my comment.
But anyways, I really don't think the city radius is a very good idea. It first isn't realistic, and second leave so many land unused.
My suggestion is to implement a "expandable city radius", in which the coverage of a city increases as population, and importances increases.
This expandable city raidus will define the boarder of each city.
I also advocate an empire building. The empire boarder should be defined by cities
Perhaps, imitating Alpha Cenaturi, empire boarder should be defined three land tiels away from the landtiles that 1) belong to the coverage of a city radius 2) is the most distant landtiles from that city. Am I confusing you?? ;( Excuse my poor English
Hehe, didn't mean to be so harsh on my comment.
But anyways, I really don't think the city radius is a very good idea. It first isn't realistic, and second leave so many land unused.
My suggestion is to implement a "expandable city radius", in which the coverage of a city increases as population, and importances increases.
This expandable city raidus will define the boarder of each city.
I also advocate an empire building. The empire boarder should be defined by cities
Perhaps, imitating Alpha Cenaturi, empire boarder should be defined three land tiels away from the landtiles that 1) belong to the coverage of a city radius 2) is the most distant landtiles from that city. Am I confusing you?? ;( Excuse my poor English
Comment