Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civ Choice - continued...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Civ Choice - continued...

    Here's another factor to consider...

    Spearman: 20 shields
    Numidian Merc: 30 shields
    Settler: 30 shields

    As such...

    Spear/Settler combo: 50 shields
    Numidian/Settler combo: 60 shields

    Let's say Spain has their capital with 4 production at size 3 - thus obtaining the spear/settler combo in 13 turns.

    Let's say Carthage has their capital with 5 production (they're industrious) at size 3 - thus obtaining the Numidian Merc/settler combo in 12 turns.

    This isn't necessarily bad, folks. The above doesn't even take into account that the Carthaginian worker they START THE GAME WITH will build mines in the city area of Carthage TWICE AS FAST as that Spanish worker can build mines around Madrid.

    In terms of building units later on, the issue is more muddled:

    Madrid, size 6, 8 shields (?): 3 turns for a spearman
    Carthage: size 6, 9 shields (?): 4 turns for a Numidian Merc

    This assumes that the Spanish capital and the Carthaginian capital have the same number of shields, which may not be the case (that Carthaginian worker is twice as fast).

    The real advantage to Spain comes with new cities being temporarily defended by warriors (and thus trying to build their first defensive unit and first temple):

    Spanish (spear+temple): 50 shields
    Carthaginian (Numidian Merc+temple): 90 shields

    Once again, however, those industrious workers (if we actually build them early on) and that +1 shield indudstrious advantage (though waste is going to KILL US here) could be intrumental.

    There's pros and cons to each...
    Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
    Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
    7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game
Working...
X