Tweet
We can make some educated guesses about our adversaries from how they played in the Demo game.
This thread is for generalizations only . If someone has comments about specific people, I think comments should go in the "Foriegn Affairs Consolate"
Here are my opinions:
1) They are warmongers, willing to fight even for relatively worthless, corrupt land. They stayed in wars a long time ie without much concern for war weariness, instead of taking enemies apart in pieces.
2) They rush built often, slowing their technology, but were slower to upgrade, choosing courthouses over "Management by Corruption" - building workers in the worst cities.
3) They persued luxuries, rarely asking if it paid off - they may be willing to pay us excessive amounts or fight like crazy for them.
4)They never broke treaties.This does not apply to this game there is plenty of backstabbing already, let's hope we can find an ally for long enough to defeat a civ.
This thread is for generalizations only . If someone has comments about specific people, I think comments should go in the "Foriegn Affairs Consolate"Here are my opinions:
1) They are warmongers, willing to fight even for relatively worthless, corrupt land. They stayed in wars a long time ie without much concern for war weariness, instead of taking enemies apart in pieces.
2) They rush built often, slowing their technology, but were slower to upgrade, choosing courthouses over "Management by Corruption" - building workers in the worst cities.
3) They persued luxuries, rarely asking if it paid off - they may be willing to pay us excessive amounts or fight like crazy for them.
4)They never broke treaties.This does not apply to this game there is plenty of backstabbing already, let's hope we can find an ally for long enough to defeat a civ.