Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

the future of internet advertising

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Scale (or reach) is the biggest factor. While the smaller sites can provide more "targeted" people, the fact that they don't reach enough of them on their own remains a big problem. IE, who cares if you reach the right people if you don't reach enough of them to make a difference.

    The best internet "networks" are those that can provide "critical" mass of the right people. Then, there is a real sales message.
    Keep on Civin'
    RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • #17
      Ming,

      Do you know anything about the different value for direct mail depending on how personalized the letter is?

      Comment


      • #18
        MarkG: thanks for the list. Unfortunately, none of those were ever going to appeal to me (and I didn't click on any of them). That's not to say that others wouldn't find them appealing. Maybe other Northern Americans would find bottomdollar interesting, for instance. I use pricewatch.

        Ming: thanks for confirming the prices. It seems like the key here is that to get the higher CPMs you need scale. But what I don't understand is that there are networks out there (one in particular that draws my attention ) that have at least aggregated some small number of sites, but have been unsuccessful in spades.

        What are the criteria that a buy-side advertiser is looking for beyond scale? Or is everything too much in flux to know anything for certain?
        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

        Comment


        • #19
          I'm glad the Economist article ended on an optimistic note. Expectations of internet advertising were probably unrealistic. Just because I don't click on an ad doesn't mean it doesn't attract my attention and therefore achieve its objective, just the same a billboard or an ad in a magazine.


          ------------------
          Chaos, panic and disorder - My work here is done.

          Comment


          • #20
            GP
            Response rates (or the value) of direct mail can vary big time.
            The factors that determine it are:
            The value or perceived value of the offer/incentive.
            How good/targeted the list used.
            The creative or appearence of the actual direct mail piece.
            General awareness of the company.

            Obviously, if you offer somebody a free VCR if they respond, response rates can be as high as 90% (bad list, people who never open it and just throw it away, people who don't respond to anything)
            But normal rates usually range from 1 to 5%
            Keep on Civin'
            RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment

            Working...
            X