As I said in my previous post, I was looking for someone to replace TigToad in DT9, so I would like to play against Hobbes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dominus Transcendi Challenge
Collapse
X
-
Just one other thing to put on the board - Misotu won DT8, transcending in 2205 (a new DT record!). Can't remember for the life of me who against....We're back!
http://www.civgaming.net/forums
Comment
-
I looked up the old threads and here are the results of the DT games that haven't been posted yet:
DT7: Misotu vs Paul; Misotu transcended in 2209
DT8: Misotu vs Mark13; Misotu transcended in 2205
DT9: Paul vs Hobbes; Paul transcended in 2215
Misotu has a 100% DT record; we'll see how well she does against Tau Ceti who also has a 100% record, but with one less game played.
Comment
-
Note to any lurkers - anyone wanting to play a DT game is welcomeWe're back!
http://www.civgaming.net/forums
Comment
-
Originally posted by mark13
Note to any lurkers - anyone wanting to play a DT game is welcome
1) Is it SMAC rather than SMAX?
2) The military 'prohibitions' seem rather vague. Could we spell this out a bit more clearly?He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Comment
-
Mark13:
Hey! I'd like to get into a DT Challenge as well. I like the concept.
I've just gotten into my first MP game myself, (AXT052) so I probably won't break any records... But at least I can take a good, educational thrashing! It would be nice to add a second game to my schedule as well. Let me know.
vitamin j
Comment
-
It is SMAC. And yes, we can set up a DT game for the two of you. With two relatively new players, it should be more interesting for you to play against each other, rather than play against more experienced players and losing without a chance.
I have the first turn and the password for the blue faction from DT4; Mark13 has the password for the white faction. The save will have me and Tau Ceti as leader names, but you can change that in the network menu.
Let me know if it's ok with you to play against each other and we can set up the game for you.
Comment
-
Hey, like Misotu and Tau Ceti, I too have a 100% DT record. (Unfortunately, mine involves 100% losses.)I'm interested in another game though. Anyone?
Last edited by H0bbes; October 9, 2001, 05:55.If you want to kiss the sky/Better learn how to kneel/On your knees boy - U2, Mysterious Ways
http://zanature.wordpress.com
Comment
-
Paul:
I'm guessing you're refering to me and Sikander? I'm in if he is. Or Hobbes. I see what you're saying about playing "more experienced players", and getting trounced, but that might be a good thing in its own right. Besides, we might not get trounced...
I too am wondering about the military restrictions. What constitutes a "limited" (maybe it was "small-scale") engagement?
Has this been a problem in previous DTs? Could you offer up some examples?
Comment
-
I'm up for a game with Vitamin J.
Hey Vitamin J. Perhaps we should limit warfare with a rule such as:
No capturing enemy bases on their starting continent.
How about planet busters?
I think a few ground rules would make it clear enough.
Let me know what you think.
SikanderHe's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Comment
-
Yeah - this has been an issue in previous DTs - limited military basically involves use of probes and the odd attacking military unit. Full-scale invasions are not permitted - neither are PBs
Anyway, looks like Sikander vs Vitamin j, Hobbes vs (?). Paul has the first blue turn of DT4, and so he can give whoever that and the password - I'll then give the other player the white password. Just let me know who to send it to and we'll be awayWe're back!
http://www.civgaming.net/forums
Comment
-
Maybe it's just me, but... The odd attacking military unit? Maybe we should say no non-probes on opposition homeland, and no bombardment of same, but anywhere else anything goes? Does that make sense?
Paul already has my email address. I'll try to message Sikander with mine.
Comment
Comment