nt
you could call it civ 2.5. The new additions to civ 2 would be larger maps, civ3s AI, and the ability to have 16 civs in 1 game, and the unique units from civ3. That would be really fun.
nt
Even if this ridiculous idea made any business or gaming sense, I highly doubt Firaxis have any rights at all to the civ 2 code.
![]()
Stop working on the Civ 2 patch and patch Civ 1!
Above all, avoid zeal. --Tallyrand.
I also think they should do an updated patch for CIV1!![]()
The post is sarcasum. I made it because civ2 is funner in the long run then civ3. Civ2 was a better game then, than Civ3 is now. Obviously, you didn't get it lol.
I like the idea with patching civ1. When was the last time they came out with a patch for that? lol

Re: lol, OneInTen
yes, sarcasm is blantantly obvious in plain text messages with no smiliesOriginally posted by Excelsior-MU
The post is sarcasum. I made it because civ2 is funner in the long run then civ3. Civ2 was a better game then, than Civ3 is now. Obviously, you didn't get it lol.
![]()
I change my vote! They should make a new patch for Pirates!
Above all, avoid zeal. --Tallyrand.
I'm assuming this is sarcasm also.civ2 is funner in the long run then civ3.
Sorry....nothing to say!
Bookmarks