Originally posted by Hauldren Collider
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Indian kid describes America
Collapse
X
-
America is unquestionably richer and Americans typically have more material possessions, but when the countries are both as rich as ours, it's relatively meaningless.
The benefits of living in Europe around things like the amount of time we spend working and universal healthcare make it a much more attractive place to live than the US for me.
Once you are comfortable, have enough to eat etc. getting more stuff isn't important, and the medical and social safety net is more important, as is actually being able to spend time with your family and have plenty of time off to see the world or whatever.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
No, it's much lower for EU than for USA. US is about 45, EU about 30.Originally posted by gribbler View PostWhat is the gini coefficient for the entire European continent, anyway? It might actually be as high as or higher than America's.
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
Interesting, and it's certianly possible HC was referring to the EU when he said "Europe".Originally posted by MikeH View PostNo, it's much lower for EU than for USA. US is about 45, EU about 30.
http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/...taset=ilc_di12
Comment
-
I can't find any data for Europe as a whole. It may not exist, works for EU as it's an actual recognised area. Not sure how else you'd characterise it.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
I would think so, as GDP per capita (PPP) indicates that there are a few European countries which have a higher per capita income than the US:Originally posted by gribbler View PostAre we talking about the average for the entire continent here?
(Especially Luxembourg and Norway, Switzerland is higher on the World Bank measure but no others, and Monaco is higher on the CIA rankings)
In addition, most of the major European countries (Germany, France, UK) have GDP per capita "higher than Mississippi".“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
At that level for most of the population it's really about how much **** you can buy that you don't need.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
See, in Europe you dont have the pathalogical desire to work yourself to death. In America the question is whether or not you deserve to be poor, not how do we handle these poor since they exist.Originally posted by MikeH View PostAmerica is unquestionably richer and Americans typically have more material possessions, but when the countries are both as rich as ours, it's relatively meaningless.
The benefits of living in Europe around things like the amount of time we spend working and universal healthcare make it a much more attractive place to live than the US for me.
Once you are comfortable, have enough to eat etc. getting more stuff isn't important, and the medical and social safety net is more important, as is actually being able to spend time with your family and have plenty of time off to see the world or whatever."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
That's exactly what the OP was about. Americans have pretty much everything they need, and the difference between rich and poor is more a matter of relative luxury than having food and shelter. Here's an old Economist piece about a poor American redneck and a Congolese doctor. They have similar income, but the redneck benefits from living in a stupidly rich country, while the doctor is owed months of back pay, and has to help support an extended family.Originally posted by MikeH View PostAt that level for most of the population it's really about how much **** you can buy that you don't need.
I just thought that bit was ****ing hilarious.Originally posted by EconomistKentucky can attract doctors from poorer parts of the world, such as South Asia. Mr Banks does not think much of these immigrant medics. He fears they may give him the wrong medicine, perhaps deliberately, and threatens to “shoot them plumb between the eyes” if they try. He is not serious about this threat, one assumes, but his sense of grievance is no less real for being incoherent.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
I love little excuses like these. Other countries are rich because they're lucky enough to have resources. America is rich because Americans are more awesomer, not because of its tremendous abundance of good land and natural resources.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostNorway's GDP is entirely because of oil revenue.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
){ :|:& };:
Comment