Yes!
No!
Bigfree's Amendment (post 2)

Let's play this like a regular game of Civ.
I know the mechanics of "PitBoss" allow for the alternative style of play you mention but I feel it is not in the spirit of Civ, a "Turn Based Strategy" game.
Make your moves, all of them. Do not make double moves until your opponent has a chance to make moves as well.
If you play it the other way you are basically playing an on-line MP game in which that the team that stays logged in the longest gains an adantage over the others.
I think we should play this as basically a PBEM with a built in turn timer/automatic turn skipper (for those that miss the timer), with no doule moves allowed during war. I think this is the most fair way to play.

Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity.
Member of Team Southern Cross in Warlords Pitboss Team Democracy Game
Member of the Great Council of the Horde in Civ4 Team Democracy Game

Yep, I can agree with that BigFree.![]()
- Lord Parkin / emperor
Playing for Team EVG in the Civ4 Intersite Democracy Game Final Round (forum | civstats)
Visit Parkinsworld - a small and friendly Civ4 Pitboss centred community!

Online is regular Civ, SP is what you play when your cable is downOriginally posted by BigFree
Let's play this like a regular game of Civ..
...If you play it the other way you are basically playing an on-line MP game in which that the team that stays logged in the longest gains an adantage over the others.![]()
I think your overrating the effects of DMs, when alls said & done you still only get one move per unit per turn & if you know the DM is out there you just play differently.
That said PAL has no problems playing to whatever no DM rule the majority agree on.

Well, I think it's time for a final decision ¿is this rule approved?
Campeón 2006 Progressive Games
civ4 mods: SCSCollateral GrayAgainstBlue ProperCrossings
civ3 terrain: Irrigations Roads Railroads Borders Multimine Sengoku Napoleonic
Bookmarks