Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: PBEM Mod: Moving Diplomatic Options

  1. #1
    snoopy369
    Senior Staff snoopy369's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2004
    Location
    Of the Peanuts Gallery
    Posts
    30,976
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts
    Local Date
    May 23, 2013
    Local Time
    07:02

    PBEM Mod: Moving Diplomatic Options

    Real simple: Map trading, MPP, and trade embargoes are all too far down the tech tree to really ever use in PBEM.

    Where should we put them? Rommel suggested, I believe, MPP and Trade Embargoes to Code of Laws, and Map Trading to Map Making.

    And, are there any other diplomatic options that should be moved or modified?
    <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
    I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

  2. #2
    Rommel2D
    Emperor Rommel2D's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Feb 2003
    Location
    Dfb climate North America
    Posts
    4,009
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 23, 2013
    Local Time
    07:02
    Map Making is the easy one- it was originally this way but changed for Conquests to make the explorer more useful. Humans use different starategies than AIs and I think will often find uses for the explorer regardless.

    MPPs and Embargoes are a tougher call. Their utility is less obvious than maps and the move strains the limits of sensible realism (an aesthetic I consider integral to the game).

    Another area of options I think would be worth considering changing is espionage. Planting a spy and studying the opponent's battle plans would provide an additional strategic option, perhaps forestalling the Knight/Cavalry buildup and inevitible conquest. I don't find it hard to imagine such tactics being used in ancient times, so moving these to writing (philosophy?) wouldn't trouble me in that aspect...
    Enjoy Slurm - it's highly addictive!

  3. #3
    punkbass2000
    King punkbass2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Feb 2002
    Location
    Waterloo, ON, Canada
    Posts
    1,500
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 23, 2013
    Local Time
    08:02
    I think moving both up to their original status is fine for No-AI games. Humans won't be easily manipulated regarding maps/contacts and you probably won't see too much of the 'Everyone knows the whole world at 1000BC' problem.
    "I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
    -me, discussing my banking history.

Similar Threads

  1. What Diplomatic Options are in Civ4?
    By Dida in forum Civilization IV General
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: October 7, 2005, 04:00
  2. PBEM Player List Options
    By Keygen in forum CtP-Multiplaying-Archive
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: September 20, 2002, 03:58
  3. Firaxis, will more diplomatic options be added?
    By Aendolin in forum Civ3-Play the World
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: September 4, 2002, 12:53
  4. No Diplomatic Options at all? ever?
    By nopk in forum Civilization III
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 2, 2001, 18:33
  5. Some better diplomatic options
    By art_vandelai in forum Civ3-Strategy-Archive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: November 21, 2001, 06:00

Visitors found this page by searching for:

pbem mod

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions