Originally posted by Lorizael
View Post
I have learnt that the purpose of debate is to demonstrate which protaganist is a ****. This is done by interminable debate which employs a mixture of facts and personal insults.
There are two sorts of facts.
- good facts, these support ones argument and should be used unsparingly
- bad facts, these do not support ones argument and should be completely ignored
Good facts need not be true. One can make stuff up and as one goes along.
Bad facts, when used by an opponent are automatically untrue and may be refuted.
The nature of truth thus depends upon ones conclusions. Conclusions which may have been drawn independently of any facts.
What have you learnt from the Internet about the nature of knowledge and truth?
Comment