Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can We At Least Talk About Who Will Run Leagues For NFL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OzzyKP
    replied
    The other league wasn't set up when I first signed up. I didn't know whether it would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Flip-flopper.

    Leave a comment:


  • OzzyKP
    replied
    Sorry.

    The other league is even now though.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Originally posted by OzzyKP View Post
    Well... sorry to mess you up since you just found your 14, but I think I'm gonna switch to the team D (they are uneven now anyhow).
    AAARRRGGH!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Poly IDP FF09 League Settings

    Here they are. Basically same as last year, but with some adjustments. Settings from last year are in parentheses, bolded, for ease of scanning.

    Roster Positions 2009:
    QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/R, K,
    DB, DB, DL, LB, LB,
    BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN (9)

    Roster Positions 2008
    QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/R, K,
    D, D, D, D,
    BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN (8)

    Offense League Value
    Completions 1
    Incomplete Passes -.5
    Passing Yards 25 yards per point
    Passing Touchdowns 6
    Interceptions -3
    Sacks -0.5
    Rushing Yards 10 yards per point
    Rushing Touchdowns 6
    Receptions 1
    Reception Yards 20 yards per point
    Reception Touchdowns 6
    Return Yards 20 yards per point
    Return Touchdowns 6
    2-Point Conversions 2 [1]
    Fumbles Lost -3
    Offensive Fumble TD Return 6
    Kickers League Value
    Field Goals 0-19 Yards 3
    Field Goals 20-29 Yards 3
    Field Goals 30-39 Yards 3
    Field Goals 40-49 Yards 4
    Field Goals 50+ Yards 5
    Field Goals Missed 0-19 Yards -2 [-3]
    Field Goals Missed 20-29 Yards -1 [-2]
    Field Goals Missed 30-39 Yards -1
    Point After Attempt Made 1
    Point After Attempt Missed -1
    Defensive Players League Value
    Tackle Solo 1
    Tackle Assist .5
    Sack 3 [1.5]
    Interception 3
    Fumble Force 2 [1.5]
    Fumble Recovery 3
    Defensive Touchdown 6
    Safety 4 [5]
    Pass Defended 1
    Block Kick 3

    Draft Type: Offline Draft
    Max Teams: 14
    Scoring Type: Head-to-Head
    Start Scoring on: Week 1
    Can't Cut List: None
    Max Moves: No maximum
    Max Acquisitions per Week: No maximum
    Max Trades: No maximum
    Trade Reject Time: 2
    Trade End Date: November 20, 2009
    Trade Review: Commissioner
    Waiver Time: No waivers [1-day, rolling list]
    Post Draft Players: Free Agents
    Playoffs: Week 14, 15 and 16 (6 teams)
    Fractional Points: Yes
    Negative Points: Yes

    Leave a comment:


  • OzzyKP
    replied
    Well... sorry to mess you up since you just found your 14, but I think I'm gonna switch to the team D (they are uneven now anyhow).

    What is the info on the other league anyhow?

    Nm, found it:
    Originally posted by flash9286 View Post
    I started the D/ST league. I copied the settings from Jag's league last year.

    ID#:390981
    League Name:Apolyton-D/ST
    PW: poly

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    IDP League is complete with 14 members.

    Now let's finalize settings, clarify draft rules and set the draft order.

    I'm adjusting the defensive players to DL, LB, LB, DB, DB. Considering adding one bench slot to accommodate. Will post proposed final settings shortly.
    Last edited by -Jrabbit; August 6, 2009, 13:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    we have 14 for the IDP league and 9 for the team D league

    need 1 (or 3) more for the team D league

    Leave a comment:


  • OzzyKP
    replied
    Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi View Post
    Or does somebody who's only in the IDP want to switch and take the last spot in the team D so IDP can be pulled back to 12?
    How many people are in the team D league? I might prefer that league regardless of the IDP being an odd number.

    Leave a comment:


  • gjramsey
    replied
    no leagues for me this season. 3 money leagues is more then enough for me to play with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Deity Dude
    replied
    Haven't checked Poly in a long time. Just got the invite and joined. Thanks JR. If possible can the commish EMAIL me at ramilhizer@yahoo.com when the draft starts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zopperoni
    replied
    Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi View Post
    Or does somebody who's only in the IDP want to switch and take the last spot in the team D so IDP can be pulled back to 12?
    I'll swap out if there aren't any new players.

    I'll give it till tomorrow and let everyone know if I switch.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    More D players = lower average points per D player.
    This doesn't scan for me. I just don't think the effect will be that great.
    Avg. pts per defender is about 8/game. LB is the most productive position, followed by safety (not CB) -- all based on tackles. CBs who return kicks and actually play, while rare, are the most valuable of all.

    Position splits will, in fact, upgrade the quality of waiver players.

    There were BTW virtually no true DLs in our league last year -- about 4-5 league-wide, most of which were hybrid LB/DEs like Ware, Harrison and Pace. Justin Tuck was IIRC the only true lineman. This is based on year-end rosters. I'd like to rectify that, and upgrading points per sack (from 1.5 to 3, plus the tackle) was with that roster change in mind. Most teams were playing at least one DB.

    I don't see any issues with finding defensive players on waivers when needed. There will be plenty out there under any format.

    I'm open to shuffling the position mix, though I'd prefer 5 to 4 total (so that total defense is worth about as much as an average QB week).

    Leave a comment:


  • Koyaanisqatsi
    replied
    Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
    Still looking for a 14th to fill up the IDP.

    Anyone? Beuller?
    Or does somebody who's only in the IDP want to switch and take the last spot in the team D so IDP can be pulled back to 12?

    Leave a comment:


  • snoopy369
    replied
    More D players = lower average points per D player. Means more people will punt the category entirely, among other things. Also means a lower quality of waiver-wire replacement.

    Honestly, there's good reason to not have positioned D players at all - breaking it out to DL/DB/LB probably reduces the value quite a bit, both in that it reduces the strategy in picking D players [guessing that a particular DB will have enough INTs to put him in the LB field] and it significantly reduces the likelihood that you'll spend any bench slots backing people up, because you'd need 3 spots to have a replacement. (D) is a mid-quality position slightly more important than TE [RB, QB, WR, D, TE, K]; (DL,DB,LB) are low quality positions (all three!), likely to have no backups at all on benches (maybe LB only). There's good arguments for splitting it out as well, of course, I'm just saying there are reasons not to.

    I'd rather see 1 DL, 2 LB, 1 DB, because then DL and DB will be reasonably available on waivers, and LB will be around the same quality as last year, which was about right I feel (probably the average person had 2 to 3 LBs on his roster, probably around 10 to 12 DL/DB were in starting positions).

    Also, PLEASE don't use DE/DT/CB/S. That is way too much separation. If they don't have DL, DB, LB option, then just go to D entirely...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X