Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What could a scientist in my Star Wars fan fic be working on?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Maximum7 View PostI decided that I’m going to have my scientist study an astrological body BUT it’s something that we haven’t identified in the real world. I’m no good at physics so I don’t know what kind of new astrological body I can make up. Does anybody have ideas for a fictional celestial body? Like something in the class of a quasar or a pulsar or a black hole
I like the antimatter comet.
Otherwise you also have the mythical planets, like Nibiru or planet X. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet..._pseudoscience
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Maximum7 View PostI decided that I’m going to have my scientist study an astrological body BUT it’s something that we haven’t identified in the real world. I’m no good at physics so I don’t know what kind of new astrological body I can make up. Does anybody have ideas for a fictional celestial body? Like something in the class of a quasar or a pulsar or a black hole
So that, foir example syomeone who is born under the zodiac sign of "Ewok" on Endor immediately can calculate that this would be the equivalent of the zodiac sign "Pisces" on Terra
Leave a comment:
-
Heh. I picture a really successful but very ignorant porn producer coming upon the term and just shouting around that he wants to do a porn with one.
Leave a comment:
-
In keeping with the porn angle.....
Leave a comment:
-
I decided that I’m going to have my scientist study an astrological body BUT it’s something that we haven’t identified in the real world. I’m no good at physics so I don’t know what kind of new astrological body I can make up. Does anybody have ideas for a fictional celestial body? Like something in the class of a quasar or a pulsar or a black hole
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Maximum7 View Post
What does that mean?
Everything is in flow/moves ... also the stars in relation to each other
Leave a comment:
-
When we look at the curvature of space time, we make the assumption that we are looking at a static snapshot of the universe and make our calculations based upon the magnitude and locations of the masses of the universe at that specific snapshot in time. However, all the objects are actually moving and any calculations that do not take that movement into account could be slightly off. Moving masses emit gravitational waves that ripple through the universe. Our current calculations assume the waves are negligible which is probably 99.9999% accurate unless we need to consider things like stellar collisions (or things bigger than that like neutron star collisions, black hole collisions, black holes colliding with a star, etc.).Last edited by pchang; March 19, 2019, 15:38.
Leave a comment: