Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Issues concerning gays -- part XXXVVV

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Wiglaf


    Can an argument be made that marriages ought to be allowed among 50 people or not?
    A marriage is between two unrelated people is it not? I'm not talking about polygamy. That isn't even a topic in this thread. Now don't be irrelevant. But you've earned the title of "MR IRRELEVANT".
    For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Wiglaf
      And Ming, a nation must have a definition of marriage. If you let gays marry, the definition as it has stood successfully for generations collapses, America is swept away by culture wave, and marriage as a venerable institution is gone, replaced by a chilling effected waste of time.
      Yeah... change... so the world will come to an end...

      Yeah... right... Your baseless claims are nothing more than your misguided opinion.

      If gay couples are allowed to get married, it will have no effect on hetero couples that are married... If the fact that gays are allowed to get married changes your opinion of the institution of marriage, that's YOUR problem... It's about love and commitment... and just because gay people get married doesn't change anything. If anything, maybe the country will become a better place... maybe people will begin excepting people for what they are... and give respect where earned instead of based on some warped view of their own personal opinons... sounds better to me than one where a bunch of bigots try to dictate to the rest of us...

      You make the call
      "If black people robbed you, I'd not consider it prejudice for you to be angry at black people in general" - Ben Kenobi
      Lessons in Christianity.

      Keep on Civin'
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • A marriage is between two unrelated people is it not? I'm not talking about polygamy. That isn't even a topic in this thread. Now don't be irrelevant. But you've earned the title of "MR IRRELEVANT".
        No, it is relevant, moron.

        If you let gays marry than why not change marriage to allow for polygamy? Since there is no objective marriage clearly.

        So, again. Is polygamy acceptable?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Wiglaf


          No, it is relevant, moron.

          If you let gays marry than why not change marriage to allow for polygamy? Since there is no objective marriage clearly.

          So, again. Is polygamy acceptable?
          No it is not relevant. Polygamy is not the same as homosexuality. Nice try really. You can't bring in irrelevant topics.
          For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

          Comment


          • MR POLYGAMY

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Giancarlo
              You can't bring in irrelevant topics.
              This from the man who brings up sex with animals, and 50 people marriages...



              Keep it up... the hole you have dug yourself is just getting deeper with every post...

              "If black people robbed you, I'd not consider it prejudice for you to be angry at black people in general" - Ben Kenobi
              Lessons in Christianity.

              Keep on Civin'
              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • Polygamy is relevant to the definition of marriage, which you're evaporating.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Wiglaf
                  Polygamy is relevant to the definition of marriage, which you're evaporating.
                  No I'm not. If anything by giving marriage to a same sex couple, you are strengthening marriage.
                  For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                  Comment


                  • By changing the definition after generations to accomodate sodomy and subjective morality, you weaken marriage, obviously.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Wiglaf
                      By changing the definition after generations to accomodate sodomy and subjective morality, you weaken marriage, obviously.
                      If the fact that gays getting married effects your relationship... you are the one with the problem, and everybody should question your love for your partner.
                      "If black people robbed you, I'd not consider it prejudice for you to be angry at black people in general" - Ben Kenobi
                      Lessons in Christianity.

                      Keep on Civin'
                      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Wiglaf
                        By changing the definition after generations to accomodate sodomy and subjective morality, you weaken marriage, obviously.
                        Heterosexuals do sodomy too. Nice try. Again, subjective morality? WTF? What is morality? It is always subjective. Especially christian morality, which is highly bigoted subjective.
                        For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Wiglaf
                          It's a chilling effect argument.
                          It's a chilling effect argument.
                          It's a chilling effect argument.
                          It's a chilling effect argument.
                          It's a chilling effect argument.
                          It's a chilling effect argument.

                          It's not a literal metaphor, for Christ's sakes stop laughing about it, cat-sex was funny in grade one.
                          WTF is a "chilling effect"?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Wiglaf
                            Can an argument be made that marriages ought to be allowed among 50 people or not?
                            No, because many of the legal implications of marriage become nonsensical when applied to more than two people.

                            Comment


                            • All homosexuals do is sodomy, within the contexts of this age-appropriate forum.

                              The fact that some heterosexuals do it is irrelevant.

                              Comment


                              • Chilling effect = slippery slope = give them an inch they take a mile.

                                And why nonsensical? Divide it up into 1/50's.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X