Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Court of Lemuria

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mapfi
    replied
    Call for impeachment of Gilgamensch by H Tower

    Case 003

    As stated in the constitution article V, section 2-b the court has to vote to determine if there are proper and legal grounds for impeachment. Since Gilgamensch is member of the court he shall not take part in this decision but is replaced by our President Pedrunn for this issue only, article V, section 2-c.

    This court has convened and has come to the following conclusions:

    A Democracy Game like ours relies on its elected officials. If they disappear without notice the game cannot function. While article II, section 1-f clearly requires executive members to appoint delegates when they are not around, the constitution says nothing like this about judges. If two judges do not show up though, the court would be rendered dysfunctional. It is the conviction of this court, that the intent in the constitution is clear: Elected officials are required to act in their positions and fulfill their duties throughout their term. If they do not the game is slowed down unnecessarily and can be seriously damaged. Therefore the court is stating that by not showing up for more than two weeks, Gilgamensch has infringed the constitution. We confirm that there are proper and legal grounds for the impeachment of Gilgamensch. It will be up to the people of this country to decide now.

    Resolution Poll: Gilgamensch is removed from office effective January 16th, Frozzy has been appointed by the court as temporary replacement.
    Last edited by mapfi; January 18, 2003, 18:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • H Tower
    replied
    Case: 001

    Case: 001

    Case Status: Closed

    Complaint: The election polls of mid December 2002 are unconstitutional.

    Ruling of the Court: The election results stand.
    It is the opinion of the court that while the election polls for the January cabinet of 2003 came close to violating the constitution, they were in fact legal election polls despite the absence of the abstain option. The Court reasons that the writers of the Constitution wrote the abstain option in the yes/no type of poll so that those who do not wish to decide one way or the other on the question may vote for abstain so that it is mearly shown that Lemuria has a vibrant voting population. An election is decided soley on whether a candidate receives more votes than any other candidate, or if running unopposed, more yes votes than no votes. All abstain votes are ignored when deciding the election.
    Furthermore, the Court believes that the authors of the Constitution wrote it to benefit our
    nation, not to hinder its progress. Throwing out the election results would cripple our country's progress and leave us leaderless. Such a power vacuum would prove dangerous for our small country. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, and the Court has decided that ultimately, its duty is to the country.

    Punishment: H Tower is ordered to gain a better understanding of the Constitution by typing up the entire document.

    Punishment Status: Completed
    Last edited by H Tower; February 8, 2003, 16:29.

    Leave a comment:


  • H Tower
    started a topic The Court of Lemuria

    The Court of Lemuria

    Do Not Post Here!

    This thread is to record the result of cases presented before the Court. Only Justices of the court should post here.


    File your cases here.


    List of Cases
    Case 001 - Presiding Judge: H Tower
    Case 002 - Presiding Judge: mapfi
    Case 003 - Presiding Judge: mapfi
    Cases 004 & 005 - Presiding Judge: mapfi
    Case 006 - Presiding Judge: mapfi



    List of Amedendments
    Amendment 001




    List of Resolutions
    Resolution 001
    Resolution 002
    Last edited by H Tower; February 8, 2003, 16:24.
Working...
X