Is the Heroic Epic worth it? (vs useful early wonders)

[Arrian]

The answer, IMO, is "it depends."

It was even more true in PTW, when GLs could rush great wonders. Now, there are basically two uses for them: armies and rushing small wonders (includes FP and Palace moves).

So, my Conquests leader decision tree looks like this:

Is my FP built and/or is my Palace where I want it? If yes, build army. If no, use leader to rush FP or Palace move.

Given the FP corruption bug in the original release, there is only 1 choice left: armies.

I wouldn't prioritize building the HE, especially not in the very early game when shields are soooo precious.

If I got a MGL in Conquests in the first 30 turns of the game, I'd probably make an army, but not load anything into it yet.

The weakest unit I'd put in an army would be archers. A 3x archer army gets these stats: 3.1.2, because of the army combat bonus.

Better yet, however, is the 3x swordsman army: 4.3.2.

-Arrian

[Cookie Monster]

Yeah I've built the Heroic Epic dozens of times and have never noticed an increase in MGL production. I build the Heroic Epic because the ai usually beats me to the early wonders anyway. Then later with the academy I build up many armies. That's my reasoning anyway. I figure it is better to get some culture from the Heroic Epic than no culture at all.

[MrWhereItsAt]

MGL can rush the Palace....

[UnityScoutChopper]

By the way, can an MGL rush a Palace? I.e. is a Palace considered a small wonder, or a great wonder?

USC

[vmxa1]

They can rush other structures, such as a cath or later a factory.
A great use can be to rush an airport in a new land. By that time you can make armies with the MA.

[Snotty]

What are MGL's good for now besides armies and small wonder rushes (Forbidden Palace)?

Armies and more armies

If I had more than one MGL pre-mil academy I would throw him into a palace/FP or just build another army. You can never have too many armies.

[Nor Me]

No, the Heroic Epic isn't worth it early compared to 200-shield cost wonders so that shouldn't be why you choose an army. In my last game, I'm fairly sure I should have used my 2nd MGL to rush the Heroic Epic for this reason.

[Artifex]

I just got the game and haven't read all the changes. Just learned MGL's don't rush wonders anymore.

After browsing the forums for the past 20 minutes, I just learned how good armies are now so I guess it's a no brainer to build an army. They improved them by leaps and bounds.

What are MGL's good for now besides armies and small wonder rushes (Forbidden Palace)?

[vmxa1]

Not sure what the Temple has to do with it, you can't rush it with a MGL. So making an army is usually my choice. That has nothing to do with the Epic though. I no longer consider it to be a big deal, but I will build it as soon as it I get a chance. By that I mean, with a city that is strong and has nothing better to do.

The reason to make the army is not to be able to build the Epic, but to kick some butt. Armies are now a big unit saver, as they are more powerful than the indiviual units by a wide margin in C3C.

[Artifex]

I play on Emperor BTW..

[Artifex]

I'm playing as the Aztecs and got a leader very early. In the first 25-30 turns I had a leader.

Wondering if I should hold onto him and research to the temple of artemis or build an army, fight, then build Heroic Epic.

My last 2 games the Heroic Epic did nothign for me and I never got another leader..even with ALOT of fighting.

Just wonderign hwo you all view the Heroic Epic? Medioce? Great? Sub-Par? Not worth it?

Seems like a big risk to me to burn a leader on this (to make an army so I can build the Epic).