The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
If we take Abilene we can get a Settler to them and build a town on them too. At least then Tanks can't blitz and have to stay in the open for counterattacks instead of attack, retreat to city... or attack again.
I don't know. Very close call. We can get more units into Quanto if it falls. More likely to get into Abilene, but won't have many (if any) units rolling.
Krill, we already knew Lego only had one rubber: when we were out, they didn't show up in the trade scene. So they couldn't trade to us... 1 rubber. Now, where is it, that's the question
It's my feeling this is too close for us... maybe wait until Vulture can sim them out, but it's my feeling we won't have over 50% chance of capturing any city. A tank defending is still 8 defense, where a inf only has 10. That's not such a difference... add the arts, and we're looking at a virtual 20 infs... Too much for 47, or even 55 M.
I think if we land regularly we can expect to have better odds of hurting Lego. The extent of that damage will be far less than if we have a rolling invasion though.
Once the threat of splitting cities is mostly gone, our Tanks will have as bad odds at taking cities as our Marines do now. They'll have individually better chances to win, but will face more Infantry.
Then Lego will be able to reinforce more as well. We won't get any more ships through after this turn, at the rate the naval side of things has been progressing. In a turn we'll have to deal with 5 more Tanks/Inf in each city we can hit too.
I'd say if it's 50:50 or around there, we should go for Quanto. We'll lose if we try slow but sure in this case.
Comment