Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

March Lists

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jamski
    replied
    Not nessessarily - the comments could just be quasi-spam. That would be an on-topic post that added nothing.

    Or there is pseudo-spam (hard to define, ask a master about that)

    Also we have secret-spam (posting where noone can see it)

    And worst of all is on-topic-spam (discussing Civ3)

    -Jam

    Leave a comment:


  • Gilgamensch
    replied
    Ummm......
    So let me get this, ' cause I'm a little slow .
    A spam comment about spam is meta-spam.
    A spam statistical analysis of spam is listmaking.
    A spam comment about the spam statistical analysis of spam is Skanky-spam?
    Is this correct?


    Yep,

    I think you understood it right...........

    And anyone commenting on, is just making on-topic posts, hence increasing the spamcount go up.

    Leave a comment:


  • flipside
    replied
    Originally posted by Skanky Burns
    The draw of the +1's he gets from it is too powerful.
    This thread has already given him almost 8% of his daily post count increase.
    Ummm......
    So let me get this, ' cause I'm a little slow .
    A spam comment about spam is meta-spam.
    A spam statistical analysis of spam is listmaking.
    A spam comment about the spam statistical analysis of spam is Skanky-spam?
    Is this correct?

    Leave a comment:


  • Skanky Burns
    replied
    The draw of the +1's he gets from it is too powerful.
    This thread has already given him almost 8% of his daily post count increase.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrSpike
    replied
    Raz weren't you away for a few days also? Amazing spam. In fact so amazing I'm surprised you do these lists to draw attention to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unspeakable Horror
    replied
    You took your picture just when I was going to pass to 3000, nice
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    And he would know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Insinuation implies subtlety, Jamksi's being blunt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    Originally posted by Jamski
    Well, posting +3s doesn't do your worthy cause any harm

    -Jam
    What are you insinuating?

    Leave a comment:


  • ixnay
    replied
    oh snap

    My estimated deity date dropped back a year from last month

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    So do I. I didn't want to shatter his allusions by telling people that I've only been posting since the 90s quite yet though.

    Leave a comment:


  • alva
    replied
    Originally posted by Big Crunch
    Deity in 2046, I think you may have a slight error in that there calculation, unless you are foreseeing repetitious bannings or PCRs in my future.
    I think he uses the 1970 date.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jamski
    replied
    Well, posting +3s doesn't do your worthy cause any harm

    -Jam

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    Hmm, if I keep up at the current rate of site contribution, I'll be deified in Aug of 2005. Shaved 5 years off, I did!

    Leave a comment:


  • Theben
    replied
    And GhengisFarb dropped off completely...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X