Yes to both of course, we need the economic and industrial boost.
On a related note: has anyone given thought to constructing boreholes outside of any base's radii (avoiding terraform eco-damage) and crawling them for energy (avoiding mineral eco-damage)? Crawling most/all of the energy to one base (the capital, most likely) combined with suitable research facilities, for example, could really give our labs a boost.
I realize this is a large undertaking and would take many former/turns (and is cause for ecological concern whether or not it actually causes fungal blooms), but the energy would be worth it IMHO. Particularly if we choose to not go FM.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official: Centralis boreholes?
Collapse
X
-
The VBcodeline for your image is : C:\Angus\Apolyton\SMAC Demo Game\Borehole Plan.bmp, and you're the only one with that file on your computer : you gotta either attach it (as a .gif or .jgp) if its less than 600pixels length, or put it on the web and link it. Until now, I think you're the only one that can see the picture.
Leave a comment:
-
...?
I can see it just fine.
Anyway, the locations are:
Red: 1 tile SE of NA.
Blue: 2 tiles SW of TA.
Leave a comment:
-
Official: Centralis boreholes?
26Red: Yes26.92%7Red: No23.08%6Red: Write-in0.00%0Red: Xenobanana0.00%0Blue: Yes.30.77%8Blue: No.19.23%5Blue: Write-in0.00%0Blue: Xenobanana0.00%0The poll is expired.
Should either, both, or neither of these two boreholes be constructed?
EDIT: poll times out in two days.
EDIT II: Look down to find the real picture.
[IMG]C:\Angus\Apolyton\SMAC Demo Game\Borehole Plan.bmp[/IMG]Last edited by GeneralTacticus; January 14, 2003, 07:03.Tags: None
Leave a comment: