Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Japan abolishes anti-dance law

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Japan abolishes anti-dance law

    And this wasn't some unenforced law, like a ban on feeding ducks at midnight or whatever.




    After a Long Legal Battle, Japan Finally Lifts Its Notorious "No Dancing" Law

    For the last four years, Japan has been under a strange spell. From Tokyo to Kyoto, dancing in clubs and bars (or any public venue, really) has been strictly prohibited by law. Only a few venues lucky enough to obtain a dancing license were allowed to carry on, and even then, doors had to close by midnight or 1AM. Those who dared to flout the rules with an errant shake of the hips have been subject to the surreal experience of getting a finger-wagging scold by a staff member, or worse, dragged out of the club by police during a raid. This no-dancing law, called fueiho in Japanese, put a serious dampener on the country's otherwise thriving electronic music industry. Businesses suffered as club owners were pressured into removing dance floors altogether, lest they get charged with the crime of making people dance.

    That all ends soon.

    In a move that will surely bring happiness and relief to dance music lovers around the country, Japan's cabinet agreed on Friday to lift the ban on dancing. Their decision comes on the heels of a committee recommendation earlier this year, and will need to be ratified by Japan's parliament. However, this final stamp of approval is not expected to face further opposition. The tourism boost that Tokyo's 2020 Olympics will bring—including a wave of foreign clubrats that will surely swarm Tokyo's nightlife districts like Roppongi and Shibuya—is believed to be a major factor in the Japanese government's decision.

    The changes approved by Japan's parliament will allow for a new category of clubs where people will be allowed to dance all night. However, there is a small—but significant—postscript: the lighting in these clubs must now be brighter than 10lux, the amount of light produced by 10 candles about three feet away. (Or, the approximate level of light in a movie theater before a show starts.) This new rule will supposedly discourage crimes and sketchy behavior.

    Japan's ban on dancing is actually a remnant of anti-prostitution fuzoku laws dating back to 1948. The police started to enforce the outdated law after a string of nightlife-related scandals, including the death of a student outside an Osaka club in in 2010. Anxiety over the "corrupted morals" of Japan's youth, fueled by fear-mongering reports in the media, contributed to a larger nightlife crackdown.

    The movement to repeal the law has been a long, protracted battle led by several prominent activist groups in Japan, which THUMP began covering in December 2013. A consortium of club owners, music journalists, and DJs called Let's Dance submitted a petition to the Diet with more than 150,000 signatures in May of last year. Others fought to raise awareness of the issue through viral videos, festivals, documentaries and parties. A group of lawyers joined the fray, lending their expertise to what was fundamentally a legal battle to begin with. That alliance of lawmakers was headed by Kenji Kosaka, a member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, whose help with pushing the movement into the upper echelons of Japan's notoriously bureaucratic goverment is irrefutable.

    "Visitors from overseas would come here to Japan and they'd wonder why they can't dance, even though you can dance at night anywhere overseas," Kosaka told Reuters. "The biggest thing that will change in this law is that you can now dance at night."

    Finally, the hundreds of thousands of dance music lovers, clubgoers, business owners, and artists can breathe easy. Their relentless efforts have paid off. Fortunately for everyone, neither Japan's police nor government was able to turn down the most effective pursuation tactic of them all: money.

    Michelle Lhooq is the Features Editor of THUMP and a former Tokyo expat - @MichelleLhooq
    Hooray for money.
    DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

  • #2
    as if young people in japan didn't have a hard enough time trying to get laid
    To us, it is the BEAST.

    Comment


    • #3
      Was Kevin Bacon involved at all in its repeal?
      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

      Comment


      • #4
        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
        ){ :|:& };:

        Comment


        • #5
          Actually, the whole thing was a country-wide work of performance art that consisted of a recreation of Footloose.
          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
          "Capitalism ho!"

          Comment


          • #6
            Meanwhile, in Utah:

            ST. GEORGE – A Halloween party at Fiesta Fun Center Friday night had unexpected guests in blue uniforms show up to shut down a part of the event – a dance party. Organizers say they had a city-approved permit allowing it; city officials say they didn’t. Canceled dance party The “Monster Mash” was an event […]


            Dancing at Monster Mash party stopped by police over disputed event permit

            Canceled dance party
            The “Monster Mash” was an event organized by the Heart of Dixie event group that advertised unlimited access to the bumper boats, go-karts, mini golf and a dance party. The event was to run from 9 p.m. Friday to 1 a.m. Saturday.
            Sometime between 9:30-10 p.m., around five-six St. George Police officers arrived on scene instructing that no dancing was to take place, said Brett Crockett, owner of Fiesta Fun Center.
            While Crockett supplied the venue and extra amenities and security for the Monster Mash, he didn’t have a hand in securing a disputed permit allowing dancing.
            There was no beef with the music
            “There was no beef with the music,” Crockett said, “It was just the mere fact of no dancing allowed.”
            Karlee Jarvis, a security supervisor for the Heart of Dixie, said a special events permit had been obtained that allowed dancing as a part of it.
            Both Jarvis and Crockett said Jared Keddington, with the promoter of the event, showed the officers their permit. Despite this, however, Jarvis said, they did as the police instructed and didn’t hold the dance party portion of the Monster Mash. Crockett said the announcement was even made over the center’s speakers that there was to be absolutely no dancing that evening.
            The rest of the event – the music, rides and mini golf – were allowed to continue unhindered.
            It was the strangest thing I’ve ever seen
            “It was the strangest thing I’ve ever seen,” Crockett said. While officers stayed and observed the event, he said, one of them was taking video.
            Some time after the police arrived, St. George Police Captain identified as Capt. Scott Staley arrived with what Jarvis described as “an absolutely new packet that said ‘no dancing’ in pen.”
            The original permit had apparently been amended, Jarvis said.
            Initial attendance at the time of the police officers’ arrival was estimated at around 400, Crockett said, though Jarvis estimated it may have been more than twice that.
            The event itself was quite controlled, Jarvis said, with security provided by both Heart of Dixie and Fiesta Fun. “We had, I would say, at least 20 security guards,” she said.
            Due to the cancellation of the dance party, news apparently spread by attendees to friends got out and the Monster Mash didn’t draw as much of a crowd as hoped. Crockett said Fiesta Fun made around 20 percent of what they had anticipated. As for attendees, some wanted refunds, Jarvis said, a lot of people were upset and left.
            As for the appearance of six officers on scene, those involved in the incident said it felt a bit heavy-handed on the police’s part.
            Disputed permit
            In response to an inquiry by St. George News about Friday night’s incident, Heart of Dixie issued the following statement:
            They sent 6 officers to make sure no one was dancing! DANCING IS NOT A CRIME
            The city issued a permit. We applied for a special event permit for a “dance”. It was issued. Then when they had no way to shut it down they produced additional pages to the permit that we were not given on which they had hand written that the dance was not allowed. Not to mention we were on private property, it is a first amendment right to dance, we weren’t playing music loud enough to be heard off the property and when the police were there NO ONE was dancing. They sent 6 officers to make sure no one was dancing! DANCING IS NOT A CRIME.
            Jarvis said the special event permit had been done online and sent into the city and it hadn’t been a face-to-face deal. She said officers told her that they, or city officials at least, had met with Keddington face-to-face over the matter and explained there could be no dancing, something which she disputes.
            Marc Mortensen, assistant to the city manager, said Saturday that applications for outdoor dances and concerts must first be heard, vetted, and finally approved by the City Council. The council needs to consider such factors as: how many people the event may bring in, is there enough parking, will there be adequate security, will there be any great impact on traffic or residents in the area, and so on.
            As the City Council needs to approve such events, Mortensen said, the city encourages people to get their event applications in at least a month before an event takes place so it can be put on the agenda for the council to address in a regular meeting.
            “It’s not an arduous process,” Mortensen said. It also wasn’t one Keddington was ignorant of as he’s promoted many other events within the city, he said.
            The application for the Monster Mash was made earlier this week, he said. And while it was ultimately approved by the city, it was supposedly spelled out that no dances could be held.
            He chose not to abide by the permit
            “He chose not to abide by the permit,” Mortensen said. “That’s why the police shut it down.”
            As to the mention of an amended permit, he said there was “no such thing.” What Staley is said to have showed officers and Keddington was a copy of the original permit highlighting there was to be no dancing.
            The City of St. George does provide many forms and permit applications on its website, the special event permit being among them. It is a five-page form that asks the applicant to check boxes detailing what type of activities will be had at the event, along with other details such as participant size, whether tents or stages are being used, site sound set up, and so forth.
            However, the form does not state that certain activities are subject to review and approval by the City Council. The requirements are outlined on a separate document.
            Recurring theme?
            Comparisons to St. George and the surrounding area and the 1980s film “Footloose” have become common since September 2011 when the City of St. George’s dance hall ordinance was put in the public eye by the now shuttered GoGo37 concert hall. In that instance, much was said over social media about the city not allowing the business to have a dance permit. However, city officials said the business owners never submitted an application in the first place. The then-owners fired back saying they believed an application wouldn’t be approved regardless of whether they were compliant with city ordinances or otherwise.
            During the summer of 2012, Dance Haven applied for a dance hall permit from the city but was subsequently denied over zoning issues and other concerns despite a public outpouring of support. Neighboring business owners were also not fond of the idea of having a dance hall next door. At the time, Councilman Gil Almquist said Dance Haven was a victim of previous dance halls that had come to St. George and left an unsavory reputation. Some on the council were concerned about the potential dance hall’s proximity to a youth treatment facility as well as business owners’ objections, while others just didn’t feel a dance hall was an application supported by zoning in the area. (See ed. note)
            Though the applicant ending up agreeing with the council’s decision, some in the public still jeered at city officials over not allowing a bona fide dance hall to take root in the city.
            In August, a back-to-school dance to be held at the Washington City Community Center by TSUnami PROductions was canceled by Washington City Police Chief Jim Keith. Concerns were evidently raised by a Facebook post made by the promoter’s son calling the event a “rave.” Though the incident occurred in Washington City, it once again led members of the public to once again make comparisons to “Footloose.”
            The act of dancing itself isn’t the deal breaker
            At the end of the day, Mortensen said, the act of dancing itself isn’t the deal breaker. The City Council approves other outdoor dances and dance-related functions throughout the year. The problem occurs when the application process isn’t followed through properly or certain requirements of the permit aren’t met.
            Tutto nel mondo è burla

            Comment


            • #7
              emphasis by you?
              To us, it is the BEAST.

              Comment


              • #8
                Nope, that's just how it pasted.
                Tutto nel mondo è burla

                Comment

                Working...
                X