Please Pray for Wiglaf

[Tupac Shakur]

That was a great review.

Plomp

[SlowwHand]

Big deal. He'll just have more time to screw someone's maid.

[Imran Siddiqui]

But he can't tell us about it for 3 months

[Aeson]

Ban everyone else who's ever posted in the OT, delete the OT and archives, and Apolyton would be a site that could earn money.

[Robert Plomp]

Wiglaf's review was accepted in the contest and placed in the spotlight on our homepage: http://apolyton.net/content.php/825-...Gods-and-Kings

Then Wiglaf edited his review and placed new lines in it:

A serious mistake Plomp made was allowing me to edit this review post-publication, a privilege I will abuse here for the first time in this review by calling intrigue a very gay, and very stupid name for a very gay and very stupid mechanic.

Well, like Wiglaf said, he abused the system to alter his review, which was then removed b/c his edits were against the forum rules.
Not in the last place b/c we do not accept it that something is being called 'very gay'. Apolyton has strict rules against discrimination/hate speach against homosexuals.

Other quotes from his edits(!) also made the post removable:

In the case of the Mayans, this means the leader immediately assumes the blowjob position.

For the record Firaxis I do not need a blowjob everytime I catch someone spying on me. Like I said, low budget. The best part is, if you tell him to stop spying on you after you ejaculate all over him

The civ5 forums aren't the off topic. If off people tend to forget that we may'd better remove the special rules we made for the off topic.

To be honest, I thought that his attempt to fool us was funny. Post a review, get it published, and then edit it. Too bad that Wiglaf lacks the ability to be subtle in his joke. Too bad that his low taste on humour only consists of sex and blowjobs and gays. What he did could have been really funny if he would have done it in good taste and within the forum rules. But unfortunately all he could was edit it in such a way that getting his review removed was the only option.

I dare anybody in here to make a case for Apolyton to accept this kind of stuff in our on topic forums.
As far as I remember everybody had input on the rules we made back then.
If Wiglaf wants I am willing to let him back in the contest by placing back his ORIGINAL review. That's the one that's also featured on Apolyton's front page. Yes, it still is.

[SlowwHand]

Wiggy is wigged out. Did you expect anything else? He's sick! Warped! Demented! I guess you could say he's representative of ACS O.T., but not Civ 5, as you pointed out.

[SlowwHand]

I just now saw the call to boycott Civ 5. That's like calling for a boycott of egg plant or something. Broccoli.

[MRT144]

Ban ****ing Ben for ****s sake.

[SlowwHand]

What's he done now? You can't ban someone for expressing an opinion. So what's he done? There are others that I'd ban. By gawd, give me the authority for an hour and this place will be improved.