Report Bugs Hints & Tips Strategy Articles Best of Civ5 Best Leaders Member reviews Stories

View Poll Results: How do you like to play (any) Civ game?

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • I plan tor a huge war, build up army and than kick ass.

    5 29.41%
  • I like to attack weaker oponents and expand my civ.

    5 29.41%
  • I play friendly, try Space victory.

    9 52.94%
  • I play friendly, try diplomatic victory

    7 41.18%
  • I only go to war if there is no other option.

    8 47.06%
  • I always play peace, any victory wil do this way.

    4 23.53%
  • I play mostly scenarios

    1 5.88%
  • I play Civ V

    9 52.94%
  • I play Civ IV BTS

    6 35.29%
  • I play some other Civ (name it please)

    1 5.88%
  • I play with my banana

    5 29.41%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: How do you define your way of playing?

  1. #1
    Beatie
    Warlord
    Join Date
    20 Apr 2001
    Location
    Spijkenisse, zuid holland, netherlands
    Posts
    194
    Country
    This is Beatie's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    09:27

    How do you define your way of playing?

    A recent toppic about gods and kings expansion give me a idea. It seems that some players who like Civ V, are peaceful players who chase non war victories. I like to see if that is true. We already know that a lot of players don't play Civ V anymore. This poll is about ALL CIV games!

    you can choose multiple options.
    don't forget to choose your Civ game.. if your like to play both Civ games, choose then both.
    Last edited by Beatie; April 25, 2012 at 08:02.

  2. #2
    gdijedi7
    Prince gdijedi7's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jul 2004
    Location
    A Classified Location in the Secret Woods.
    Posts
    394
    Country
    This is gdijedi7's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    09:27
    I like to fight wars. I have since Civ 1. I just like it.

    That said, I'm usually pretty peaceful, fighting mainly when attacked. Civ 5 especially becomes pretty draconian when you start wiping civs out. On the rare occasions when I still go for military victories, I usually build until someone attacks me. Then I mobilize an army and anihilate them (much harder to do in Civ 5. Now, I usually have a military city very early on.). This gets one of my friends mad at me, so they attack me, and I kill them.

    Soon, I'm fighting the whole world because Alexander tried to take me down. That gets very annoying.
    I don't know what I've been told!
    Deirdre's got a Network Node!
    Love to press the Buster Switch!
    Gonna nuke that crazy witch!

  3. #3
    Lambiorix_be
    Warlord Lambiorix_be's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Feb 2001
    Location
    Boechout, Belgium
    Posts
    278
    Country
    This is Lambiorix_be's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    11:27
    Quote Originally Posted by gdijedi7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I like to fight wars. I have since Civ 1. I just like it.

    That said, I'm usually pretty peaceful, fighting mainly when attacked. Civ 5 especially becomes pretty draconian when you start wiping civs out. On the rare occasions when I still go for military victories, I usually build until someone attacks me. Then I mobilize an army and anihilate them (much harder to do in Civ 5. Now, I usually have a military city very early on.). This gets one of my friends mad at me, so they attack me, and I kill them.

    Soon, I'm fighting the whole world because Alexander tried to take me down. That gets very annoying.
    I don't build a big army, just a decent defense force but I make sure I have a very good industry and/or a surplus of money so that when unjustly attacked by an evil no-good civ I can make and buy sufficient units to defend first and then counter attack (usually I go for at least one city before agreeing to a peace..that makes me feel better )

  4. #4
    gdijedi7
    Prince gdijedi7's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jul 2004
    Location
    A Classified Location in the Secret Woods.
    Posts
    394
    Country
    This is gdijedi7's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    09:27
    Yeah. My army's always tiny until I end up in a war.

    Then, yes. I supersize. Mostly go for aircraft, though. I build nine Minutemen to form the core of my army and keep upgrading them. I usually have very little in the way of cavalry, maybe one or two units. I usually have no navy, or a small navy until Destroyers, who form the base of my large navy, mainly to protect my multitudinous carriers. I almost never have battleships, but I like to have at least a couple of missile cruisers if I have the aluminum.
    I don't know what I've been told!
    Deirdre's got a Network Node!
    Love to press the Buster Switch!
    Gonna nuke that crazy witch!

  5. #5
    Proteus_MST
    King Proteus_MST's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Dec 2001
    Location
    Yuggoth
    Posts
    2,631
    Country
    This is Proteus_MST's Country Flag
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    11:27
    In Civ IV my playstyle was mostly peacefully ...
    usually I would only go to war if there were no other viable possibility to expand on my continent anymore and would then plan the war strategically, usually by bulding a large number of units after getting some kind of strategic tech (for example access to cavalry or tanks) so that the war can be resolved as fast as possible.
    (although for certain AIs I would prefer war over peace, for example Isabella, if she has a different religion as myself ... as I known that she might wage a holy war against everyone of a different religion)

    In Civ V it is the other way round...
    as I know that the AIs in Civ V usually consist of backstabbing bastards, who just wait for the right moment to betray me, no matter how good our relations are, I prefer to exterminate them as soon as possible, as long as they are still small, especially if they are on the same continent.
    (thanks to choosing the germans with Furor teutonicus I usually have no problems in gathering troops in a short time ... most of them may be just brutes, but combined with a few more advanced ranged troops, usually they are sufficient to overwhelm my neighbors )
    Last edited by Proteus_MST; April 27, 2012 at 16:15.
    As part of your equipment, you are to have a trowel, and when you squat outside, you are to scrape a hole with it and then turn and cover your excrement.
    Deut. 23: 13

  6. #6
    Beatie
    Warlord
    Join Date
    20 Apr 2001
    Location
    Spijkenisse, zuid holland, netherlands
    Posts
    194
    Country
    This is Beatie's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    09:27
    I usually try to get as big as possible, try to conquer my continent and build up my army as soon as I got Infantry and Tanks. I love oversea wars. Than try to land just like D-day but then with 3 complete army's that I choose to land on 3 different places. Sometimes I let them capitulate to make them my vassals, Usually I try to get the strongest opponent no matter what kind of relationship I have with them. Build the forbidden place asap so maintenance cost are low, and send infantry troops through airlift to all the new city's. Then I try to mobilize my entire invasion force for the next victim. This is not possible at the highest levels...(for me) the highest level I have done this with success is Prince level. As you can see.. I am a warmonger

  7. #7
    Adagio
    Deity Adagio's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Jun 2001
    Posts
    11,259
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    11:27
    My play style is unfortunately not possible because of the bad AI (which was present in all Civ games)
    I would love to play as one who takes out all the warmongering civilizations first and let the peaceful civilizations stay. Unfortunately the AI is created in an annoying way that if I take out a civilization who is hated by anyone (and before the war everybody loves me) everybody starts hating me (even if it was the hated civilization who started the war)
    I'm always carefully considering taking out the enemies who is hated by everybody and who hates me as the first victims

    But in the end my play style is I'll build up a great army and take out the enemies one by one... show no mercy
    This space is empty... or is it?

  8. #8
    Zaphod Beeblebrox
    King
    Join Date
    24 Aug 1999
    Location
    aachen .. well moved to göttingen a few years ago
    Posts
    1,102
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    09:27
    there is almost always stuff more interesting to do than starting a war (for instance hitting enter and read on apolyton while the cpu is busy scheming the ais against each other)

  9. #9
    bchris964
    Settler
    Join Date
    11 May 2013
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    04:27
    I am also used to play this game.War was very interesting because of twisted behavior of me and my competitor.
    At last I conquered the battle from my strong opponent.
    I am winner.

  10. #10
    Gasper
    Settler
    Join Date
    03 Oct 2013
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    04:27
    I love playing Mario type games with forest and lots of fun.

  11. #11
    lourencohen
    Settler
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    04:27
    I like to attack weaker oponents and expand my civ.

  12. #12
    Jerieth
    Settler Jerieth's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Feb 2014
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    04:27
    I like building up forces and strategically attacking other empires. Civ 5 seems to penalize you a lot for that. I do enjoy the more domestic policies too, like controlling what money is spent on what, and building improvements, but it is sorta secondary to defense. I also miss the random events CIV IV had.

  13. #13
    NucularGandhi
    Settler
    Join Date
    17 Feb 2014
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    September 15, 2014
    Local Time
    11:27
    I used to play ICS style in Civ I, Civ II and Freeciv: expand quickly, keep army minimal until needed and then quickly build it up and start attacking other civs one by one.

    Now I have played Civ 5 and started to play much more experimental styles, as ICS is not that obvious strategy anymore. I've enjoyed religion in Civ 5 and I find that city states add depth to make diplomatic game style more interesting.

Similar Threads

  1. How do you define terrorism?
    By The diplomat in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: November 10, 2003, 12:59
  2. How do you define yourself?
    By Pekka in forum Off-Topic-Archive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 23, 2003, 19:13
  3. define pop booming for me
    By lord of the mark in forum AC-General/Help/Strategy-Archive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 12, 2003, 05:35
  4. Let's Define ICS
    By CygnusZ in forum Civilization III
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 5, 2001, 22:04
  5. How would you define the civ genre?
    By The diplomat in forum Civ3-General-Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 16, 2000, 00:47

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions