Who would be the most able American to deliver the end of the world in December 2012?

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 08:24

It will be a monumental task given that they will have only two weeks to deliver in December, so if Obama fails to deliver that over next year and a half - who is the man or woman for the job?

I am not exactly sure how are they supposed to do it, short of starting a total nuclear war over the first two weeks in charge, but let's not dwell on the details, this poll is about "Who has the capacity to deliver for the Mayans?"

*David Cameron applies, because UK really is the 51st state

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 08:37

I have complete confidence in George Bush.

He is just the man for this task. He could invade everything all at once. No more of this nonsense of invading one country at a time. Yup, wholesale invasion is the way to go.

Edit: And if David Cameron won't help then put Tony Blair back on the job. Tony is obedient.

George and Tony for destroying the world.

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 08:38

but he is disqualified, cannot run for the third term

MikeH · April 11, 2011, 08:39

Originally Posted by OneFootInTheGrave

*David Cameron applies, because UK really is the 51st state

David Cameron can't even deliver a policy in his own country.

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 08:40

exactly - in an attempt to prove he can do something, he really is the "wild card" here... trident is not retired yet for a reason

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 08:41

Originally Posted by OneFootInTheGrave

but he is disqualified, cannot run for the third term

Yes he can.

Just can't have three consecutive terms.

Edit: I didn't see Sarah on the poll. Yes, we can confidence in her. The North Korean allies will be a great help.
And, yeah. David Cameron has something to prove. Who do i vote for? Dave or Sarah?

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 08:43

Originally Posted by MikeH

David Cameron can't even deliver a policy in his own country.

But he can deliver a speech in Pakistan. Can he do anything more than deliver a speech in Pakistan is the big question.

Guynemer · April 11, 2011, 08:47

Donald Trump or Michele Bachmann.

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 08:48

George is disqualified, I am sorry to say

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-...s_Constitution

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

I voted for David, he will try to do something else and it will happen, he has what it takes

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 08:52

Originally Posted by Guynemer

Donald Trump or Michele Bachmann.

Donald Trump actually achieved something in this world, so I suppose he is too attached to all the stuff he made to destroy them in one go...

Michele - well she is a good candidate... she could do it indeed

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 08:53

Thanks. i knew Roosevelt had 4 terms but wasn't aware of that amendment (after Roosevelt).

Anyway, another serious contender has emerged. Trump and/or his hairstyle. (We established, in another thread, the hairstyle would cause a dramatic increase in anti-American sentiment.)

MikeH · April 11, 2011, 08:54

Originally Posted by Braindead

But he can deliver a speech in Pakistan. Can he do anything more than deliver a speech in Pakistan is the big question.

Can he deliver a speech in Pakistan that anyone actually gives a f**k about?

MikeH · April 11, 2011, 08:55

Shouldn't Florida Rigging Bush be allowed a go on the White House now?

MikeH · April 11, 2011, 08:56

OMG googling him led me to find out that there is a member of the Bush family called:

Dorothy Bush Koch

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 08:58

Originally Posted by MikeH

Can he deliver a speech in Pakistan that anyone actually gives a f**k about?

I should be very surprised if anyone did give a f**k about it? I was merely asking if this "demonstration of his ability" might be the high point of his achievements as PM?

MikeH · April 11, 2011, 09:06

I had very low expectations for him as PM, but he's actually failing to meet them.

loinburger · April 11, 2011, 09:07

Regardless of who is elected in 2012, Obama will still be President in December 2012

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 09:11

handover in January

... or there will be no handover as it will all be over by then as Obama will be royally pissed off he lost to Palin and blow the world up in revenge... but damn

loinburger · April 11, 2011, 09:13

Though it could still be Biden, I suppose, depending on where the death rays fall first

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 09:13

I voted for Sarah. If she was elected the mere thought of her as President might cause the world to blow up beforehand or something? She could have Trump as her VP to make sure.

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 09:14

and Cameron or Bananaman, so most of the poll options are still valid

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 09:15

Originally Posted by Braindead

I voted for Sarah. If she was elected the mere thought of her as President might cause the world to blow up or something?

that would be the pinnacle of American Democracy - a woman president.

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 09:16

Originally Posted by OneFootInTheGrave

handover in January

... or there will be no handover as it will all be over by then as Obama will be royally pissed off he lost to Palin and blow the world up in revenge... but damn

Do you think he would start off by bombing Alaska?

Braindead · April 11, 2011, 09:19

Originally Posted by OneFootInTheGrave

that would be the pinnacle of American Democracy - a woman president.

Yep. Got a bad case of PMT. Take it out on the Russians with a nuclear strike, that'll show 'em.

OneFootInTheGrave · April 11, 2011, 09:28

Well it all makes sense now...

Obama will make a deal of cooperation and understanding with the Russians, and as a part it he will show a gesture of goodwill - that he is giving Alaska, where it belongs, back to them, making Palin automatically ineligible to be the president... the president of Russia - maybe, but not the president of USA... followed by a bombing campaign to assist the Russians to take what is rightfully theirs...

In a fateful stream of events the Russians will misinterpret bombing of Alaska as an American attack on Russia, but this will not be the end of the world yet...

In the meantime David Cameron will be testing the safety of trident defence systems, launch a nuke by accident, which the Americans will interpret as Europe siding with the Russians in a blatant show of anti-Americanism...and this is how the world will end...