Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Texas demographer: 'It's basically over for Anglos'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Texas demographer: 'It's basically over for Anglos'

    http://blogs.chron.com/texaspolitics...demograph.html

    Looking at population projections for Texas, demographer Steve Murdock concludes: "It's basically over for Anglos."

    Two of every three Texas children are now non-Anglo and the trend line will become even more pronounced in the future, said Murdock, former U.S. Census Bureau director and now director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University.
    Steve Murdock.jpg
    Steve Murdock

    Today's Texas population can be divided into two groups, he said. One is an old and aging Anglo and the other is young and minority. Between 2000 and 2040, the state's public school enrollment will see a 15 percent decline in Anglo children while Hispanic children will make up a 213 percent increase, he said.

    The state's largest county - Harris - will shed Anglos throughout the coming decades. By 2040, Harris County will have about 516, 000 fewer Anglos than lived in the Houston area in 2000, while the number of Hispanics will increase by 2.5 million during the same period, Murdock said. The projection assumes a net migration rate equal to one-half of 1990-2000.

    Most of the state's population growth is natural, Murdock told the House Mexican American Legislative Caucus today. About 22 percent of the growth comes from people moving to Texas from other states.

    About 6 percent of the state's population is not documented, he said.

    B y 2040, only 20 percent of the state's public school enrollment will be Anglo, he said. Last year, non-Hispanic white children made up 33.3 percent of the state's 4.8 million public school enrollment.

    Of the state's 254 counties, 79 recorded declining population during the past 20 years. All are rural. An additional 30 Texas counties, he said, would have also lost population had they not experienced Hispanic growth.

    The state's future looks bleak assuming the current trend line does not change because education and income levels for Hispanics lag considerably behind Anglos, he said.

    Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said. And the average household income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted so it will be worse than what it sounds.


    "It's a terrible situation that you are in. I am worried," Murdock said.
    I would add a comment of my own but Mangan already said it:

    Texans seem to want to fool themselves that their pro-business economic climate and abundant land mean that everything is alright. Politically, California is in many ways the opposite of Texas, with high taxes, and anti-business climate - but also with a fair amount of land - yet "Anglos" are on their way to becoming a minority here. As the demographer says, he's "worried" that, leaving aside everything else, 30% of the labor force won't even have a high school diploma.

    Sounds to me like Texas needs House White American Caucus pronto. For all the good it would do; they'd probably spend most of their time proclaiming their love of diversity and/or apologizing for the Alamo.
    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

  • #2
    So what?
    The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

    Comment


    • #3
      Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said. And the average household income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted so it will be worse than what it sounds.
      That would be a dramatic decrease in real income. Do you believe this bull****? You're amazingly gullible.

      Comment


      • #4
        reconquista
        I need a foot massage

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gribbler View Post
          That would be a dramatic decrease in real income. Do you believe this bull****? You're amazingly gullible.
          I don't think it will fall by that much, though I must admit I haven't done the math.

          Generally I do believe the US as a whole will suffers a smaller drop in real income due to changing demographics.

          By 2050 the US per capita GDP will have declined, because of third-world immigration, to 86.8% of its 2004 value.
          I'm a believer in technological progress so I'm a bit more optimistic, I think the number will be closer to 90% of its 2004 value.
          Last edited by Heraclitus; February 27, 2011, 11:49.
          Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
          The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
          The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View Post
            So what?

            Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said.
            Don't worry your pretty little head, the article say nothing about limiting immigration. It does however suggest the above quote is cause for concern. Perhaps we can agree that *ahem* "the schools are failing our children", no?
            Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
            The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
            The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

            Comment


            • #7
              The Mexicans are taking Texas back and there's nothing Slowwie can do about it.
              Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MOBIUS View Post
                The Mexicans are taking Texas back and there's nothing Slowwie can do about it.
                And the way they'll achieve it is just so deliciously ironic
                Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                Comment


                • #9
                  "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                  "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Technically, Texas is still a majority white state since hispanics are included in that demographic by the U.S. census.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Riesstiu IV View Post
                      Technically, Texas is still a majority white state since hispanics are included in that demographic by the U.S. census.
                      The article was about Anglos.
                      Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                      The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                      The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        When has immigration lowered the wealth of the United States? This guy seems to assume that Hispanics don't want educations or a better life for their children.
                        John Brown did nothing wrong.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Heraclitus View Post
                          I don't think it will fall by that much, though I must admit I haven't done the math.

                          Generally I do believe the US as a whole will suffers a smaller drop in real income due to changing demographics.



                          I'm a believer in technological progress so I'm a bit more optimistic, I think the number will be closer to 90% of its 2004 value.
                          Even if you make racist assumptions, the racial gap in personal income isn't that big in the US.

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persona...ed_States#Race

                          You can see whites who work full time only make ~25% more than blacks. Their median income is ~50% higher than that of hispanics. There's no way a demographic shift would have a bigger impact over the next several decades than gains in productivity from technology.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Heraclitus View Post
                            The article was about Anglos.
                            Angles

                            Jutes:

                            Picts:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Felch View Post
                              When has immigration lowered the wealth of the United States? This guy seems to assume that Hispanics don't want educations or a better life for their children.
                              He is arguing that per-capita wealth will fall, and that if current education trends continue that Hispanics will continue to be far less educated than the population as a whole. They could of course get more pro education in the next 40 years and do something about it, but that can not be predicted whereas he can make assumptions about continuing existing trends.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X